skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Field inversion machine learning augmented turbulence modeling for time-accurate unsteady flow
Field inversion machine learning (FIML) has the advantages of model consistency and low data dependency and has been used to augment imperfect turbulence models. However, the solver-intrusive field inversion has a high entry bar, and existing FIML studies focused on improving only steady-state or time-averaged periodic flow predictions. To break this limit, this paper develops an open-source FIML framework for time-accurate unsteady flow, where both spatial and temporal variations of flow are of interest. We augment a Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence model's production term with a scalar field. We then integrate a neural network (NN) model into the flow solver to compute the above augmentation scalar field based on local flow features at each time step. Finally, we optimize the weights and biases of the built-in NN model to minimize the regulated spatial-temporal prediction error between the augmented flow solver and reference data. We consider the spatial-temporal evolution of unsteady flow over a 45° ramp and use only the surface pressure as the training data. The unsteady-FIML-trained model accurately predicts the spatial-temporal variations of unsteady flow fields. In addition, the trained model exhibits reasonably good prediction accuracy for various ramp angles, Reynolds numbers, and flow variables (e.g., velocity fields) that are not used in training, highlighting its generalizability. The FIML capability has been integrated into our open-source framework DAFoam. It has the potential to train more accurate RANS turbulence models for other unsteady flow phenomena, such as wind gust response, bubbly flow, and particle dispersion in the atmosphere.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2223676
PAR ID:
10505584
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
AIP
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Physics of Fluids
Volume:
36
Issue:
5
ISSN:
1070-6631
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. One of the key factors in simulating realistic wall-bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers is the selection of an appropriate turbulence model for the steady Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS) equations. In this investigation, the performance of several turbulence models was explored for the simulation of steady, compressible, turbulent flow on complex geometries (concave and convex surface curvatures) and unstructured grids. The turbulence models considered were the Spalart–Allmaras model, the Wilcox k- ω model and the Menter shear stress transport (SST) model. The FLITE3D flow solver was employed, which utilizes a stabilized finite volume method with discontinuity capturing. A numerical benchmarking of the different models was performed for classical Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) cases, such as supersonic flow over an isothermal flat plate, transonic flow over the RAE2822 airfoil, the ONERA M6 wing and a generic F15 aircraft configuration. Validation was performed by means of available experimental data from the literature as well as high spatial/temporal resolution Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). For attached or mildly separated flows, the performance of all turbulence models was consistent. However, the contrary was observed in separated flows with recirculation zones. Particularly, the Menter SST model showed the best compromise between accurately describing the physics of the flow and numerical stability. 
    more » « less
  2. A three-dimensional Eulerian two-phase flow solver, SedFoam, has been developed for various sediment transport applications. The solver has demonstrated success in modeling sheet flow and bedforms driven by oscillatory flows using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) formulation. However, the accuracy of the RANS formulation for more complex flows, such as scour around structures, requires further evaluation. SedFoam has recently been enhanced to incorporate two-phase large-eddy simulation (LES) capability. In this study, RANS and LES approaches are tested via a three-dimensional case of wave-induced local scour around a single vertical circular pile. Two laboratory experiments, one with an erodible bed and the other with a rigid bed, were chosen for simulation, with both experiments having a Keulegan-Carpenter (KC) number of 10. The k-ω turbulence closure was selected for the RANS simulation, and the dynamic Lagrangian subgrid closure was chosen for the LES simulation. Numerical results reveal that both RANS and LES simulations can resolve lee-wake vortices, although the vortices are significantly weaker in the RANS simulation. In comparison with the LES results, the RANS approach fails to predict horseshoe vortex with sufficient intensity, leading to an underestimation of scour hole depth development. Although the scour depths develop at a very similar rate in the early stage, the scour depth predicted by the RANS simulation quickly reaches equilibrium, while the LES simulation follows the measured trend. These findings indicate that a turbulence-resolving methodology, i.e. LES, is necessary for accurate scour simulations. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Purpose The purpose of this work is to investigate the similarity requirements for the application of multifidelity modeling (MFM) for the prediction of airfoil dynamic stall using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Design/methodology/approach Dynamic stall is modeled using the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and Menter's shear stress transport turbulence model. Multifidelity models are created by varying the spatial and temporal discretizations. The effectiveness of the MFM method depends on the similarity between the high- (HF) and low-fidelity (LF) models. Their similarity is tested by computing the prediction error with respect to the HF model evaluations. The proposed approach is demonstrated on three airfoil shapes under deep dynamic stall at a Mach number 0.1 and Reynolds number 135,000. Findings The results show that varying the trust-region (TR) radius (λ) significantly affects the prediction accuracy of the MFM. The HF and LF simulation models hold similarity within small (λ ≤ 0.12) to medium (0.12 ≤ λ ≤ 0.23) TR radii producing a prediction error less than 5%, whereas for large TR radii (0.23 ≤ λ ≤ 0.41), the similarity is strongly affected by the time discretization and minimally by the spatial discretization. Originality/value The findings of this work present new knowledge for the construction of accurate MFMs for dynamic stall performance prediction using LF model spatial- and temporal discretization setup and the TR radius size. The approach used in this work is general and can be used for other unsteady applications involving CFD-based MFM and optimization. 
    more » « less
  4. Turbulent boundary layers subject to severe acceleration or strong favorable pressure gradient (FPG) are of fundamental and technological importance. Scientifically, they elicit great interest from the points of view of scaling laws, the complex interaction between the outer and inner regions, and the quasi-laminarization phenomenon. Many flows of industrial and technological applications are subject to strong acceleration such as convergent ducts, turbines blades and nozzles. Our recent numerical predictions (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 775, pp. 189-200, 2015) of turbulent boundary layers subject to very strong FPG with high spatial/temporal resolution, i.e. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), have shown a meaningful weakening of the Reynolds shear stresses with an evident logarithmic behavior. In the present study, assessment of three different turbulence models (Shear Stress Transport, k-w and Spalart-Allmaras, henceforth SST, k-w and SA, respectively) in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations is performed. The main objective is to evaluate the ability of popular turbulence models in capturing the characteristic features present during the quasi-laminarization phenomenon in highly accelerating turbulent boundary layers. Favorable pressure gradient is prescribed by a top converging surface (sink flow) with an approximately constant acceleration parameter of K = 4.0 x 10^(-6). Furthermore, the quasi-laminarization effect on the temperature field is also examined by solving the energy equation and assuming the temperature as a passive scalar. Validation of RANS results is carried out by means of a large DNS dataset. 
    more » « less
  5. An incoming canonical spatially developing turbulent boundary layer (SDTBL) over a 2-D curved hill is numerically investigated via the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations plus two eddy-viscosity models: the K−ω SST (henceforth SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras (henceforth SA) turbulence models. A spatially evolving thermal boundary layer has also been included, assuming temperature as a passive scalar (Pr = 0.71) and a turbulent Prandtl number, Prt, of 0.90 for wall-normal turbulent heat flux modeling. The complex flow with a combined strong adverse/favorable streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient caused by concave/convex surface curvatures has been replicated from wind-tunnel experiments from the literature, and the measured velocity and pressure fields have been used for validation purposes (the thermal field was not experimentally measured). Furthermore, direct numerical simulation (DNS) databases from the literature were also employed for the incoming turbulent flow assessment. Concerning first-order statistics, the SA model demonstrated a better agreement with experiments where the turbulent boundary layer remained attached, for instance, in Cp, Cf, and Us predictions. Conversely, the SST model has shown a slightly better match with experiments over the flow separation zone (in terms of Cp and Cf) and in Us profiles just upstream of the bubble. The Reynolds analogy, based on the St/(Cf/2) ratio, holds in zero-pressure gradient (ZPG) zones; however, it is significantly deteriorated by the presence of streamline curvature-driven pressure gradient, particularly due to concave wall curvature or adverse-pressure gradient (APG). In terms of second-order statistics, the SST model has better captured the positively correlated characteristics of u′ and v′ or positive Reynolds shear stresses ( > 0) inside the recirculating zone. Very strong APG induced outer secondary peaks in and turbulence production as well as an evident negative slope on the constant shear layer. 
    more » « less