We study supply and demand shocks in a disaggregated model with multiple sectors, multiple factors, input-output linkages, downward nominal wage rigidities, credit-constraints, and a zero lower bound. We use the model to understand how the COVID-19 crisis, an omnibus supply and demand shock, affects output, unemployment, and inflation, and leads to the coexistence of tight and slack labor markets. We show that negative sectoral supply shocks are stagflationary, whereas negative demand shocks are deflationary, even though both can cause Keynesian unemployment. Furthermore, complementarities in production amplify Keynesian spillovers from supply shocks but mitigate them for demand shocks. This means that complementarities reduce the effectiveness of aggregate demand stimulus. In a stylized quantitative model of the United States, we find supply and demand shocks each explain about one-half of the reduction in real GDP from February to May 2020. Although there was as much as 6 percent Keynesian unemployment, this was concentrated in certain markets. Hence, aggregate demand stimulus is one quarter as effective as in a typical recession where all labor markets are slack. (JEL E12, E23, E24, E31, E32, E62, I12)
more »
« less
Inflation and Asset Returns
The past half-century has seen major shifts in inflation expectations, how inflation comoves with the business cycle, and how stocks comove with Treasury bonds. Against this backdrop, we review the economic channels and empirical evidence on how inflation is priced in financial markets. Not all inflation episodes are created equal. Using a New Keynesian model, we show how “good” inflation can be linked to demand shocks and “bad” inflation to cost-push shocks driving the economy. We then discuss asset pricing implications of “good” and “bad” inflation. We conclude by providing an outlook for inflation risk premia in the world of newly rising inflation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2149193
- PAR ID:
- 10512701
- Publisher / Repository:
- Annual Reviews
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Annual Review of Financial Economics
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1941-1367
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 433 to 448
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract We show that in a broad class of menu cost models, the first-order dynamics of aggregate inflation in response to arbitrary shocks to aggregate costs are nearly the same as in Calvo models with suitably chosen Calvo adjustment frequencies. We first prove that the canonical menu cost model is first-order equivalent to a mixture of two time-dependent models, which reflect the extensive and intensive margins of price adjustment. We then show numerically that in any plausible parameterization, this mixture is well approximated by a single Calvo model. This close numerical fit carries over to other standard specifications of menu cost models. Thus, for shocks that are not too large, the Phillips curve for a menu cost model looks like the New Keynesian Phillips curve, but with a higher slope.more » « less
-
We build a model in which the Fed and the market disagree about future aggregate demand. The market anticipates monetary policy “mistakes,” which affect current demand and induce the Fed to partially accommodate the market’s view. The Fed expects to implement its view gradually. Announcements that reveal an unexpected change in the Fed’s belief provide a microfoundation for monetary policy shocks. Tantrum shocks arise when the market misinterprets the Fed’s belief and overreacts to its announcement. Uncertainty about tantrums motivates further gradualism and communication. Finally, disagreements affect the market’s expected inflation and induce a policy trade-off similar to “ cost-push” shocks. (JEL D83, E12, E31, E43, E44, E52, E58)more » « less
-
Query optimization is the process of finding an efficient query execution plan for a given SQL query. The runtime difference between a good and a bad plan can be tremendous. For example, in the case of TPC-H query 5, a query with 5 joins, the difference between the best and the worst plan is more than 10,000×. Therefore, it is vital to avoid bad plans. The dominating factor which differentiates a good from a bad plan is their join order and whether this join order avoids large intermediate results.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract In this paper, we introduce an algorithm for computing $$p$$-adic integrals on bad reduction hyperelliptic curves. For bad reduction curves, there are two notions of $$p$$-adic integration: Berkovich–Coleman integrals, which can be performed locally, and abelian integrals with desirable number-theoretic properties. By covering a bad reduction hyperelliptic curve with basic wide-open sets, we reduce the computation of Berkovich–Coleman integrals to the known algorithms on good reduction hyperelliptic curves. These are due to Balakrishnan, Bradshaw, and Kedlaya and to Balakrishnan and Besser for regular and meromorphic $$1$$-forms, respectively. We then employ tropical geometric techniques due to the 1st-named author with Rabinoff and Zureick-Brown to convert the Berkovich–Coleman integrals into abelian integrals. We provide examples of our algorithm, verifying that certain abelian integrals between torsion points vanish.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

