An official website of the United States government
Internet of Things (IoT) devices have strict energy constraints as they often operate on a battery supply. The cryptographic operations within IoT devices consume substantial energy and are vulnerable to a class of hardware attacks known as side-channel attacks. To reduce the energy consumption and defend against side-channel attacks, we propose combining adiabatic logic and Magnetic Tunnel Junctions to form our novel Energy Efficient-Adiabatic CMOS/MTJ Logic (EE-ACML). EE-ACML is shown to be both low energy and secure when compared to existing CMOS/MTJ architectures. EE-ACML reduces dynamic energy consumption with adiabatic logic, while MTJs reduce the leakage power of a circuit. To show practical functionality and energy savings, we designed one round of PRESENT-80 with the proposed EE-ACML integrated with an adiabatic clock generator. The proposed EE-ACML-based PRESENT-80 showed energy savings of 67.24% at 25 MHz and 86.5% at 100 MHz when compared with a previously proposed CMOS/MTJ circuit. Furthermore, we performed a CPA attack on our proposed design, and the key was kept secret.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on April 1, 2025
Energy Efficient CLB Design Based on Adiabatic Logic for IoT Applications
Many IoT applications require high computational performance and flexibility, and FPGA is a promising candidate. However, increased computation power results in higher energy dissipation, and energy efficiency is one of the key concerns for IoT applications. In this paper, we explore adiabatic logic for designing an energy efficient configurable logic block (CLB) and compare it to the CMOS counterpart. The simulation results show that the proposed adiabatic-logic-based look-up table (LUT) has significant energy savings for the frequency range of 1 MHz to 40 MHz, and the least energy savings is at 40 MHz, which is 92.94% energy reduction compared to its CMOS counterpart. Further, the three proposed adiabatic-logic-based memory cells are 14T, 16T, and 12T designs with at least 88.2%, 84.2%, and 87.2% energy savings. Also, we evaluated the performance of the proposed CLBs using an adiabatic-logic-based LUT (AL-LUT) interfacing with adiabatic-logic-based memory cells. The proposed design shows significant energy reduction compared to a CMOS LUT interface with SRAM cells for different frequencies; the energy savings are at least 91.6% for AL-LUT 14T, 89.7% for AL-LUT 16T, and 91.3% AL-LUT 12T.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2232235
- PAR ID:
- 10513340
- Publisher / Repository:
- MDPI
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Electronics
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 2079-9292
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1309
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Approximate computing is a promising approach for error-tolerant applications running on the Internet of Things (IoT) edge devices to reduce power consumption. However, approximate computation is susceptible to side-channel attacks, such as attacks based on differential power analysis (DPA). Energy efficiency could be further enhanced by applying adiabatic logic in approximate edge computing while increasing its protection against the side-channel attacks. As a case study, we are presenting two approximate adders based on adiabatic logic to illustrate the benefits of approximate computation combined with adiabatic logic. The proposed approximate adders leverage the dual-rail property of adiabatic logic to minimize the overall size and further decrease energy consumption. In this article, the first design is True Sum Approximate Adder (TSAA), while the second design is True Carry-out Approximate Adder (TCAA). There are fewer transistors in adiabatic logic-based TSAA and TCAA compared to CMOS based accurate mirror adder (AMA). At 12.5 MHz operating frequency and 45 nm technology node, the adiabatic TSAA and TCAA achieved power savings of 95.4% and 95.48%, energy savings of 90.80%, and 90.96% in comparison with the standard CMOS AMA. We also show that both designs proposed are more secure against DPA attacks.more » « less
-
The tremendous growth in the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has increased focus on the energy efficiency and security of an IoT device. In this paper, we will present a design level, non-volatile adiabatic architecture for low-energy and Correlation Power Analysis (CPA) resistant IoT devices. IoT devices constructed with CMOS integrated circuits suffer from high dynamic energy and leakage power. To solve this, we look at both adiabatic logic and STT-MTJs (Spin Transfer Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junctions) to reduce both dynamic energy and leakage power. Furthermore, CMOS integrated circuits suffer from side-channel leakage making them insecure against power analysis attacks. We again look to adiabatic logic to design secure circuits with uniform power consumption, thus, defending against power analysis attacks. We have developed a hybrid adiabatic-MTJ architecture using two-phase adiabatic logic. We show that hybrid adiabatic-MTJ circuits are both low energy and secure when compared with CMOS circuits. As a case study, we have constructed one round of PRESENT and have shown energy savings of 64.29% at a frequency of 25 MHz. Furthermore, we have performed a correlation power analysis attack on our proposed design and determined that the key was kept hidden.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The adaptation of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) for consumer electronics has enabled us to uplift everyday life. Low-power smart and secure computing devices are needed to sustain the expected growth of consumer IoT. Adiabatic switching is a modern approach that recycles the energy stored in load capacitance to save energy. Further, the cryptographic circuit designed using adiabatic switching is secure against the Correlation Power Analysis (CPA) attack in contrast to the same circuit designed using standard CMOS. In this paper, we propose 2-SPGAL, a 2-phase sinusoidal signal based clocking implementation of Symmetric Pass Gate Adiabatic Logic (SPGAL). As a case study, we simulated the design of PRESENT-80 (a lightweight cryptographic scheme) one round with an in-built Power Clock Generator (PCG) with 45nm technology. The 2-SPGAL shows on an average 82.76% and 67.35% better energy saving compared to standard CMOS, and 2-EE-SPFAL (another 2-phase adiabatic logic), respectively at a frequency range from 100 kHz to 25 MHz with a load of 1 fF. The 2-SPGAL has 16.78% savings of the number of transistors compared to 2-EE-SPFAL for implementation of one round PRESENT-80. Further, the CPA attacks reveal the key in standard CMOS, however, 2-SPGAL PRESENT-80 adiabatic logic design was successful to protect the key.more » « less
-
Design and Evaluation of a Spintronic In-Memory Processing Platform for Non-Volatile Data EncryptionIn this paper, we propose an energy-efficient reconfigurable platform for in-memory processing based on novel 4-terminal spin Hall effect-driven domain wall motion devices that could be employed as both non-volatile memory cell and in-memory logic unit. The proposed designs lead to unity of memory and logic. The device to system level simulation results show that, with 28% area increase in memory structure, the proposed in-memory processing platform achieves a write energy ~15.6 fJ/bit with 79% reduction compared to that of SOT-MRAM counterpart while keeping the identical 1ns writing speed. In addition, the proposed in-memory logic scheme improves the operating energy by 61.3%, as compared with the recent non-volatile in-memory logic designs. An extensive reliability analysis is also performed over the proposed circuits. We employ Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm as a case study to elucidate the efficiency of the proposed platform at application level. Simulation results exhibit that the proposed platform can show up to 75.7% and 30.4% lower energy consumption compared to CMOS-ASIC and recent pipelined domain wall (DW) AES implementations, respectively. In addition, the AES Energy-Delay Product (EDP) can show 15.1% and 6.1% improvements compared to the DW-AES and CMOS-ASIC implementations, respectively.more » « less
