skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Friday, December 13 until 2:00 AM ET on Saturday, December 14 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Polynomial Bounds for Chromatic Number. IV: A Near-polynomial Bound for Excluding the Five-vertex Path
Abstract

A graphGisH-freeif it has no induced subgraph isomorphic toH. We prove that a$$P_5$$P5-free graph with clique number$$\omega \ge 3$$ω3has chromatic number at most$$\omega ^{\log _2(\omega )}$$ωlog2(ω). The best previous result was an exponential upper bound$$(5/27)3^{\omega }$$(5/27)3ω, due to Esperet, Lemoine, Maffray, and Morel. A polynomial bound would imply that the celebrated Erdős-Hajnal conjecture holds for$$P_5$$P5, which is the smallest open case. Thus, there is great interest in whether there is a polynomial bound for$$P_5$$P5-free graphs, and our result is an attempt to approach that.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
2154169
PAR ID:
10517553
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Springer Link
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Combinatorica
Volume:
43
Issue:
5
ISSN:
0209-9683
Page Range / eLocation ID:
845 to 852
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Chromatic number, Induced subgraphs
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The Dushnik–Miller dimension of a posetPis the leastdfor whichPcan be embedded into a product ofdchains. Lewis and Souza isibility order on the interval of integers$$[N/\kappa , N]$$[N/κ,N]is bounded above by$$\kappa (\log \kappa )^{1+o(1)}$$κ(logκ)1+o(1)and below by$$\Omega ((\log \kappa /\log \log \kappa )^2)$$Ω((logκ/loglogκ)2). We improve the upper bound to$$O((\log \kappa )^3/(\log \log \kappa )^2).$$O((logκ)3/(loglogκ)2).We deduce this bound from a more general result on posets of multisets ordered by inclusion. We also consider other divisibility orders and give a bound for polynomials ordered by divisibility.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Let$$X\rightarrow {{\mathbb {P}}}^1$$XP1be an elliptically fiberedK3 surface, admitting a sequence$$\omega _{i}$$ωiof Ricci-flat metrics collapsing the fibers. LetVbe a holomorphicSU(n) bundle overX, stable with respect to$$\omega _i$$ωi. Given the corresponding sequence$$\Xi _i$$Ξiof Hermitian–Yang–Mills connections onV, we prove that, ifEis a generic fiber, the restricted sequence$$\Xi _i|_{E}$$Ξi|Econverges to a flat connection$$A_0$$A0. Furthermore, if the restriction$$V|_E$$V|Eis of the form$$\oplus _{j=1}^n{\mathcal {O}}_E(q_j-0)$$j=1nOE(qj-0)forndistinct points$$q_j\in E$$qjE, then these points uniquely determine$$A_0$$A0.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    The classic Impagliazzo–Nisan–Wigderson (INW) pseudorandom generator (PRG) (STOC ‘94) for space-bounded computation uses a seed of length$$O(\log n \cdot \log (nw/\varepsilon )+\log d)$$O(logn·log(nw/ε)+logd)to fool ordered branching programs of lengthn, widthw, and alphabet sizedto within error$$\varepsilon $$ε. A series of works have shown that the analysis of the INW generator can be improved for the class ofpermutationbranching programs or the more generalregularbranching programs, improving the$$O(\log ^2 n)$$O(log2n)dependence on the lengthnto$$O(\log n)$$O(logn)or$${\tilde{O}}(\log n)$$O~(logn). However, when also considering the dependence on the other parameters, these analyses still fall short of the optimal PRG seed length$$O(\log (nwd/\varepsilon ))$$O(log(nwd/ε)). In this paper, we prove that any “spectral analysis” of the INW generator requires seed length$$\begin{aligned} \Omega \left( \log n\cdot \log \log \left( \min \{n,d\}\right) +\log n\cdot \log \left( w/\varepsilon \right) +\log d\right) \end{aligned}$$Ωlogn·loglogmin{n,d}+logn·logw/ε+logdto fool ordered permutation branching programs of lengthn, widthw, and alphabet sizedto within error$$\varepsilon $$ε. By “spectral analysis” we mean an analysis of the INW generator that relies only on the spectral expansion of the graphs used to construct the generator; this encompasses all prior analyses of the INW generator. Our lower bound matches the upper bound of Braverman–Rao–Raz–Yehudayoff (FOCS 2010, SICOMP 2014) for regular branching programs of alphabet size$$d=2$$d=2except for a gap between their$$O\left( \log n \cdot \log \log n\right) $$Ologn·loglognterm and our$$\Omega \left( \log n \cdot \log \log \min \{n,d\}\right) $$Ωlogn·loglogmin{n,d}term. It also matches the upper bounds of Koucký–Nimbhorkar–Pudlák (STOC 2011), De (CCC 2011), and Steinke (ECCC 2012) for constant-width ($$w=O(1)$$w=O(1)) permutation branching programs of alphabet size$$d=2$$d=2to within a constant factor. To fool permutation branching programs in the measure ofspectral norm, we prove that any spectral analysis of the INW generator requires a seed of length$$\Omega \left( \log n\cdot \log \log n+\log n\cdot \log (1/\varepsilon )\right) $$Ωlogn·loglogn+logn·log(1/ε)when the width is at least polynomial inn($$w=n^{\Omega (1)}$$w=nΩ(1)), matching the recent upper bound of Hoza–Pyne–Vadhan (ITCS 2021) to within a constant factor.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    LetXbe ann-element point set in thek-dimensional unit cube$$[0,1]^k$$[0,1]kwhere$$k \ge 2$$k2. According to an old result of Bollobás and Meir (Oper Res Lett 11:19–21, 1992) , there exists a cycle (tour)$$x_1, x_2, \ldots , x_n$$x1,x2,,xnthrough thenpoints, such that$$\left( \sum _{i=1}^n |x_i - x_{i+1}|^k \right) ^{1/k} \le c_k$$i=1n|xi-xi+1|k1/kck, where$$|x-y|$$|x-y|is the Euclidean distance betweenxandy, and$$c_k$$ckis an absolute constant that depends only onk, where$$x_{n+1} \equiv x_1$$xn+1x1. From the other direction, for every$$k \ge 2$$k2and$$n \ge 2$$n2, there existnpoints in$$[0,1]^k$$[0,1]k, such that their shortest tour satisfies$$\left( \sum _{i=1}^n |x_i - x_{i+1}|^k \right) ^{1/k} = 2^{1/k} \cdot \sqrt{k}$$i=1n|xi-xi+1|k1/k=21/k·k. For the plane, the best constant is$$c_2=2$$c2=2and this is the only exact value known. Bollobás and Meir showed that one can take$$c_k = 9 \left( \frac{2}{3} \right) ^{1/k} \cdot \sqrt{k}$$ck=9231/k·kfor every$$k \ge 3$$k3and conjectured that the best constant is$$c_k = 2^{1/k} \cdot \sqrt{k}$$ck=21/k·k, for every$$k \ge 2$$k2. Here we significantly improve the upper bound and show that one can take$$c_k = 3 \sqrt{5} \left( \frac{2}{3} \right) ^{1/k} \cdot \sqrt{k}$$ck=35231/k·kor$$c_k = 2.91 \sqrt{k} \ (1+o_k(1))$$ck=2.91k(1+ok(1)). Our bounds are constructive. We also show that$$c_3 \ge 2^{7/6}$$c327/6, which disproves the conjecture for$$k=3$$k=3. Connections to matching problems, power assignment problems, related problems, including algorithms, are discussed in this context. A slightly revised version of the Bollobás–Meir conjecture is proposed.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions.arXiv:2010.09793) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios such Green function estimates are equivalent to the uniform rectifiability of a set. The present paper tackles a strong analogue of these results, starting with the “flagship degenerate operators on sets with lower dimensional boundaries. We consider the elliptic operators$$L_{\beta ,\gamma } =- {\text {div}}D^{d+1+\gamma -n} \nabla $$Lβ,γ=-divDd+1+γ-nassociated to a domain$$\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^n$$ΩRnwith a uniformly rectifiable boundary$$\Gamma $$Γof dimension$$d < n-1$$d<n-1, the now usual distance to the boundary$$D = D_\beta $$D=Dβgiven by$$D_\beta (X)^{-\beta } = \int _{\Gamma } |X-y|^{-d-\beta } d\sigma (y)$$Dβ(X)-β=Γ|X-y|-d-βdσ(y)for$$X \in \Omega $$XΩ, where$$\beta >0$$β>0and$$\gamma \in (-1,1)$$γ(-1,1). In this paper we show that the Green functionGfor$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }$$Lβ,γ, with pole at infinity, is well approximated by multiples of$$D^{1-\gamma }$$D1-γ, in the sense that the function$$\big | D\nabla \big (\ln \big ( \frac{G}{D^{1-\gamma }} \big )\big )\big |^2$$|D(ln(GD1-γ))|2satisfies a Carleson measure estimate on$$\Omega $$Ω. We underline that the strong and the weak results are different in nature and, of course, at the level of the proofs: the latter extensively used compactness arguments, while the present paper relies on some intricate integration by parts and the properties of the “magical distance function from David et al. (Duke Math J, to appear).

     
    more » « less