More Like this

1. Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classification

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3580507.3597818  

   Ahmadi, Saba; Blum, Avrim; Yang, Kunhe (July 2023, Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation)

   We study the problem of online binary classification where strategic agents can manipulate their observable features in predefined ways, modeled by a manipulation graph, in order to receive a positive classification. We show this setting differs in fundamental ways from classic (non-strategic) online classification. For instance, whereas in the non-strategic case, a mistake bound of ln |H| is achievable via the halving algorithm when the target function belongs to a known class H, we show that no deterministic algorithm can achieve a mistake bound o(Δ) in the strategic setting, where Δ is the maximum degree of the manipulation graph (even when |H| = O(Δ)). We complement this with a general algorithm achieving mistake bound O(Δ ln |H|). We also extend this to the agnostic setting, and show that this algorithm achieves a Δ multiplicative regret (mistake bound of O(Δ · OPT + Δ · ln |H|)), and that no deterministic algorithm can achieve o(Δ) multiplicative regret. Next, we study two randomized models based on whether the random choices are made before or after agents respond, and show they exhibit fundamental differences. In the first, fractional model, at each round the learner deterministically chooses a probability distribution over classifiers inducing expected values on each vertex (probabilities of being classified as positive), which the strategic agents respond to. We show that any learner in this model has to suffer linear regret. On the other hand, in the second randomized algorithms model, while the adversary who selects the next agent must respond to the learner's probability distribution over classifiers, the agent then responds to the actual hypothesis classifier drawn from this distribution. Surprisingly, we show this model is more advantageous to the learner, and we design randomized algorithms that achieve sublinear regret bounds against both oblivious and adaptive adversaries. 

   more » « less
2. Incentivized Truthful Communication for Federated Bandits

   Wei, Zhepei; Li, Chuanhao; Ren, Tianze; Xu, Haifeng Xu; Wang, Hongning (May 2024, 12th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024))

   To enhance the efficiency and practicality of federated bandit learning, recent advances have introduced incentives to motivate communication among clients, where a client participates only when the incentive offered by the server outweighs its participation cost. However, existing incentive mechanisms naively assume the clients are truthful: they all report their true cost and thus the higher cost one participating client claims, the more the server has to pay. Therefore, such mechanisms are vulnerable to strategic clients aiming to optimize their own utility by misreporting. To address this issue, we propose an incentive compatible (i.e., truthful) communication protocol, named Truth-FedBan, where the incentive for each participant is independent of its self-reported cost, and reporting the true cost is the only way to achieve the best utility. More importantly, Truth-FedBan still guarantees the sub-linear regret and communication cost without any overhead. In other words, the core conceptual contribution of this paper is, for the first time, demonstrating the possibility of simultaneously achieving incentive compatibility and nearly optimal regret in federated bandit learning. Extensive numerical studies further validate the effectiveness of our proposed solution. 

   more » « less
3. On the Complexity of Computing Sparse Equilibria and Lower Bounds for No-Regret Learning in Games

   Anagnostides, I; Kalavasis, A; Sandholm, T; Zampetakis, M (January 2024, ITCS24)

   Characterizing the performance of no-regret dynamics in multi-player games is a foundational problem at the interface of online learning and game theory. Recent results have revealed that when all players adopt specific learning algorithms, it is possible to improve exponentially over what is predicted by the overly pessimistic no-regret framework in the traditional adversarial regime, thereby leading to faster convergence to the set of coarse correlated equilibria (CCE) – a standard game-theoretic equilibrium concept. Yet, despite considerable recent progress, the fundamental complexity barriers for learning in normal- and extensive-form games are poorly understood. In this paper, we make a step towards closing this gap by first showing that – barring major complexity breakthroughs – any polynomial-time learning algorithms in extensive-form games need at least 2log1/2−o(1) |T | iterations for the average regret to reach below even an absolute constant, where |T | is the number of nodes in the game. This establishes a superpolynomial separation between no-regret learning in normal- and extensive-form games, as in the former class a logarithmic number of iterations suffices to achieve constant average regret. Furthermore, our results imply that algorithms such as multiplicative weights update, as well as its optimistic counterpart, require at least 2(log logm)1/2−o(1) iterations to attain an O(1)-CCE in m-action normal-form games under any parameterization. These are the first non-trivial – and dimension-dependent – lower bounds in that setting for the most well-studied algorithms in the literature. From a technical standpoint, we follow a beautiful connection recently made by Foster, Golowich, and Kakade (ICML ’23) between sparse CCE and Nash equilibria in the context of Markov games. Consequently, our lower bounds rule out polynomial-time algorithms well beyond the traditional online learning framework, capturing techniques commonly used for accelerating centralized equilibrium computation. 

   more » « less
4. A Pseudo-Market Approach to Allocation with Priorities

   https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20150259  

   He, Yinghua; Miralles, Antonio; Pycia, Marek; Yan, Jianye (August 2018, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics)

   null (Ed.)

   We propose a pseudo-market mechanism for no-monetary-transfer allocation of indivisible objects based on priorities such as those in school choice. Agents are given token money, face priority-specific prices, and buy utility-maximizing random assignments. The mechanism is asymptotically incentive compatible, and the resulting assignments are fair and constrained Pareto efficient. Hylland and Zeckhauser’s (1979) position-allocation problem is a special case of our framework, and our results on incentives and fairness are also new in their classical setting. (JEL D63, D82, H75, I21, I28) 

   more » « less
5. Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual Bandits

   Li, Zhaoqi; Ratliff, Lillian; Nassif, Houssam; Jamieson, Kevin; Jain, Lalit (January 2022, Advances in neural information processing systems)

   Koyejo, S.; Mohamed, S.; Agarwal, A.; Belgrave, D.; Cho, K.; Oh, A. (Ed.)

   In the stochastic contextual bandit setting, regret-minimizing algorithms have been extensively researched, but their instance-minimizing best-arm identification counterparts remain seldom studied. In this work, we focus on the stochastic bandit problem in the (ǫ, δ)-PAC setting: given a policy class Π the goal of the learner is to return a policy π ∈ Π whose expected reward is within ǫ of the optimal policy with probability greater than 1 − δ. We characterize the first instance-dependent PAC sample complexity of contextual bandits through a quantity ρΠ, and provide matching upper and lower bounds in terms of ρΠ for the agnostic and linear contextual best-arm identification settings. We show that no algorithm can be simultaneously minimax-optimal for regret minimization and instance-dependent PAC for best-arm identification. Our main result is a new instance-optimal and computationally efficient algorithm that relies on a polynomial number of calls to an argmax oracle. 

   more » « less