skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Fragility and Recovery Models for Energy, Water, and Wastewater Systems for Seismic Regional Risk and Resilience Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review and Database
Title: Fragility and Recovery Models for Energy, Water, and Wastewater Systems for Seismic Regional Risk and Resilience Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review and Database
Fragility functions and recovery models are often used to assess lifeline systems subjected to extreme hazards. However, even though many databases for fragility and recovery models exist for essential buildings and transportation systems, fragility and recovery models for other lifelines are fragmented across the literature. This article provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art seismic fragility functions and recovery models for energy (power, liquid fuel, and gas), water, and wastewater systems that can be applied in hazard risk and resiliency assessments of communities. The review focuses on fragility and recovery model parameters and summarizes the methods and validation used in developing the models. In addition, the reviewed fragility functions are compiled in an open-source database with a graphical user interface. Critical gaps in the literature are discussed to guide future research endeavors.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2103713
PAR ID:
10579263
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Natural Hazards Review
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Natural Hazards Review
Volume:
24
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1527-6988
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Engineering structures)
    Risk assessment and life cycle cost analysis of electric power systems facilitate analysis and efficient management of compound risks from wind hazards and asset deteriorations. Fragility functions are key components for these analyses as they provide the probability of failure of poles given the hazard intensity. Despite a number of efforts that analyzed the wind fragility of utility wood poles, impacts of key design variables on the likelihood of failure of poles have not been yet characterized. This paper, for the first time, provides a set of multi-dimensional fragility models that are functions of key factors including class, age, and height of poles, number and diameter of conductors, span length, and wind speed and direction. Unlike existing generic pole fragility models, this new class of fragility functions is able to accurately represent various configurations of power distribution systems. Therefore, it can reliably support decisions for installation of new or replacement of existing damaged or decayed poles. The generated fragility models are also used to investigate impacts of design variables. For example, results indicate that when height is considered as a covariate for the fragility function, the likelihood of failure of wood poles for a given height increases with class number. However, if height is treated as an uncertain variable, and therefore, excluded as a covariate from the fragility model, lower classes of poles may have higher failure probability as they are often used for higher clearance limits. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Earthquake Spectra)
    Although fragility function development for structures is a mature field, it has recently thrived on new algorithms propelled by machine learning (ML) methods along with heightened emphasis on functions tailored for community- to regional-scale application. This article seeks to critically assess the implications of adopting alternative traditional and emerging fragility modeling practices within seismic risk and resilience quantification to guide future analyses that span from the structure to infrastructure network scale. For example, this article probes the similarities and differences in traditional and ML techniques for demand modeling, discusses the shift from one-parameter to multiparameter fragility models, and assesses the variations in fragility outcomes via statistical distance concepts. Moreover, the previously unexplored influence of these practices on a range of performance measures (e.g. conditional probability of damage, risk of losses to individual structures, portfolio risks, and network recovery trajectories) is systematically evaluated via the posed statistical distance metrics. To this end, case studies using bridges and transportation networks are leveraged to systematically test the implications of alternative seismic fragility modeling practices. The results show that, contrary to the classically adopted archetype fragilities, parameterized ML-based models achieve similar results on individual risk metrics compared to structure-specific fragilities, promising to improve portfolio fragility definitions, deliver satisfactory risk and resilience outcomes at different scales, and pinpoint structures whose poor performance extends to the global network resilience estimates. Using flexible fragility models to depict heterogeneous portfolios is expected to support dynamic decisions that may take place at different scales, space, and time, throughout infrastructure systems. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering)
    The seismic fragility of a system is the probability that the system enters a damage state under seismic ground motions with specified characteristics. Plots of the seismic fragilities with respect to scalar ground motion intensity measures are called fragility curves. Recent studies show that fragility curves may not be satisfactory measures for structural seismic performance, since scalar intensity measures cannot comprehensively characterize site seismicity. The limitations of traditional seismic intensity measures, e.g., peak ground acceleration or pseudo-spectral acceleration, are shown and discussed in detail. A bivariate vector with coordinates moment magnitude m and source-to-site distance r is proposed as an alternative seismic intensity measure. Implicitly, fragility surfaces in the (m, r)-space could be used as graphical representations of seismic fragility. Unlike fragility curves, which are functions of scalar intensity measures, fragility surfaces are characterized by two earthquake-hazard parameters, (m, r). The calculation of fragility surfaces may be computationally expensive for complex systems. Thus, as solutions to this issue, a bi-variate log-normal parametric model and an efficient calculation method, based on stochastic-reduced-order models, for fragility surfaces are proposed. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, CRC Press)
    Frequency and intensity of hydrological hazards have increased. Consequently, riverine bridges are suffering damage due to flooding. Fragility functions are used to estimate such damage conditioned on hazard intensity. However, flood fragility functions are limited for riverine bridges, and generally lack for masonry bridges. This paper presents a methodology to derive flood fragility functions for masonry arch bridges accounting for component failure modes. Demand and capacity of bridge components are derived from existing analytical expressions, and account for aleatory uncertainties via Monte Carlo simulations. The methodology is illustrated using a UK masonry bridge, which collapsed due to winter flood-induced scour. The investigated bridge is divided into its components (e.g., arches, pier) and a scour fragility function is derived for the arch, based on a lognormal cumulative distribution fitting to the derived failure probability data. Future research will develop scour fragility functions for other bridge components. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, Entropy)
    Understanding the microscopic mechanism of the transition of glass remains one of the most challenging topics in Condensed Matter Physics. What controls the sharp slowing down of molecular motion upon approaching the glass transition temperature Tg, whether there is an underlying thermodynamic transition at some finite temperature below Tg, what the role of cooperativity and heterogeneity are, and many other questions continue to be topics of active discussions. This review focuses on the mechanisms that control the steepness of the temperature dependence of structural relaxation (fragility) in glass-forming liquids. We present a brief overview of the basic theoretical models and their experimental tests, analyzing their predictions for fragility and emphasizing the successes and failures of the models. Special attention is focused on the connection of fast dynamics on picosecond time scales to the behavior of structural relaxation on much longer time scales. A separate section discusses the specific case of polymeric glass-forming liquids, which usually have extremely high fragility. We emphasize the apparent difference between the glass transitions in polymers and small molecules. We also discuss the possible role of quantum effects in the glass transition of light molecules and highlight the recent discovery of the unusually low fragility of water. At the end, we formulate the major challenges and questions remaining in this field. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email