skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Modeling Regional and Local Resilience of Infrastructure Networks Following Disruptions from Natural Hazards
This paper presents a framework to evaluate the regional and local resilience of infrastructure networks following disruptions from natural hazards. Herein, the regional resilience of a network relates to the accessibility of a community within a larger network, whereas the local resilience concerns the ability of a network to provide its intended service within the boundaries of a community. Using this framework, a methodology is developed to demonstrate its application to a road and highway transportation network disrupted by ground shaking and inundation under a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake and tsunami scenario. The regional network extents encompass the entire coast of the US state of Oregon. Embedded within this regional network are 18 local networks associated with coastal communities. Regional and local connectivity indexes are defined to identify the initial damage and then track the postdisaster recovery of the transportation network, i.e., evaluate the network resilience. The study results identify the attributes that lead to a regionally or locally resilient network and highlight the importance of considering local infrastructure networks embedded within larger regional networks. It is shown that without regional considerations, the time to recover may be severely underpredicted. The methodology is further used as a decision support tool to demonstrate how mitigation options impact the transportation network’s resilience. The importance of strategically considering mitigation options is emphasized as some communities see significant reductions in time to recover, whereas others see little to no improvement.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2103713
PAR ID:
10579327
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ASCE
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume:
28
Issue:
3
ISSN:
1076-0342
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)
    Dynamic transportation networks are embedded in all levels of biological organization. Ever-growing anthropogenic disturbances and an increasingly variable climate highlight the importance of understanding how these networks restructure under environmental perturbations. Polydomous wood ants provide a convenient model system to study the resilience of self-organizing multi-source, multi-sink transportation networks. We used 10 years of longitudinal empirical data on both unperturbed and experimentally manipulated colony networks to develop and validate a comprehensive dynamic simulation model to study network restructuring after resource removal. We performed simulation experiments to study the effects of excluding food sources with varying importance, either temporarily or permanently, imitating pulse and press perturbations of the networks. We found that removing heavily used resources, corresponding to a strong targeted perturbation, persistently decreased network efficiency, unlike random or weak perturbations. We also found that strong perturbations had excessively adverse effects on robustness and function, reducing the networks’ ability to withstand potential future perturbations. When transportation networks develop around the efficient use of a few key resources, they may be unable to quickly recover from the loss of these through self-organized restructuring. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the interaction of perturbation strength and network structure in studying transportation network dynamics. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    The recent decade has seen a rise in community resilience modeling, including a quest to model infrastructure resilience (its exposure, damage, and restoration) under extreme events. These efforts entail measuring, visualizing, and probing alternatives to support mitigation, recovery, and resilience-enhancing interventions. However, the practice demands developing different input sub-models, considering various layers of uncertainty, and integrating these for the final assessment. In this project, we present how the resources of the DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure (DesignSafe-CI) can support such efforts. We present different tools that can be leveraged from DesignSafe directly or through its interoperability with other platforms, such as the Interdependent Networked Community Resilience Modeling Environment (IN-CORE). We present illustrative examples of how to leverage publicly available data in DesignSafe-CI and models within the IN-CORE platform to create an infrastructure resilience assessment pipeline. These examples are developed and analyzed using JupyterLab in DesignSafe. Furthermore, we present how JupyterLab HPC in DesignSafe-CI enhances the modeling and testing capabilities as the analysis of larger infrastructure systems (e.g., detailed transportation networks) becomes feasible. While the illustrative example uses earthquakes as the hazard type, the leveraged tools, platforms, and shared codes can be adapted to multiple hazards. This project is created to share the material presented on December 11 (2024) in the DesignSafe Webinar "Resilience Assessment of Community Infrastructure: Leveraging HPC Resources at DesignSafe-CI and Interoperability with IN-CORE". You can find the recording of the webinar at the following link: https://youtu.be/Bdb8s4Rc4h4?feature=shared 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    The recent decade has seen a rise in community resilience modeling, including a quest to model infrastructure resilience (its exposure, damage, and restoration) under extreme events. These efforts entail measuring, visualizing, and probing alternatives to support mitigation, recovery, and resilience-enhancing interventions. However, the practice demands developing different input sub-models, considering various layers of uncertainty, and integrating these for the final assessment. In this project, we present how the resources of the DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure (DesignSafe-CI) can support such efforts. We present different tools that can be leveraged from DesignSafe directly or through its interoperability with other platforms, such as the Interdependent Networked Community Resilience Modeling Environment (IN-CORE). We present illustrative examples of how to leverage publicly available data in DesignSafe-CI and models within the IN-CORE platform to create an infrastructure resilience assessment pipeline. These examples are developed and analyzed using JupyterLab in DesignSafe. Furthermore, we present how JupyterLab HPC in DesignSafe-CI enhances the modeling and testing capabilities as the analysis of larger infrastructure systems (e.g., detailed transportation networks) becomes feasible. While the illustrative example uses earthquakes as the hazard type, the leveraged tools, platforms, and shared codes can be adapted to multiple hazards. This project is created to share the material presented on December 11 (2024) in the DesignSafe Webinar "Resilience Assessment of Community Infrastructure: Leveraging HPC Resources at DesignSafe-CI and Interoperability with IN-CORE". You can find the recording of the webinar at the following link: https://youtu.be/Bdb8s4Rc4h4?feature=shared 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Water Resources Research)
    Abstract Failures within water distribution systems are usually not isolated and tend to propagate to corresponding transportation infrastructure, yet most criticality and resilience analyses of water distribution networks are conducted for the individual water infrastructure without accounting for interdependence. To address this research gap, this study investigates how the critical components identified within water distribution systems may be different when accounting for failure propagation to the transportation road network. In this study, failure propagation is assumed to be based on geospatial interdependence and unidirectional, starting from water distribution network components to transportation network components. A logical interaction network is constructed considering the interdependence between both infrastructures, and multiobjective optimization is used to solve for the critical water distribution components considering: quantity of failures, performance loss, and financial costs. This work presents a modular workflow for water distribution criticality analysis and proposes the Kolmogorov‐Smirnov distance statistic between solution sets as a measure of the significance of interdependency for decision making. Results from the case study suggest that as the magnitude of water infrastructure failure increases beyond a threshold, the interdependency between water distribution and transportation becomes more significant. The difference between identified critical components using only information from water distribution and using both water distribution and transportation is significantly different (with greater than 95% confidence) for the city of Tampa, when more than 40 components fail (are isolated). These results will assist utilities in asset management and strategy assessment, by helping prioritize component repair and better allocate resources for critical interdependent infrastructures. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, The Review of Economic Studies)
    Abstract Each year in the US, hundreds of billions of dollars are spent on transportation infrastructure and billions of hours are lost in traffic. We develop a quantitative general equilibrium spatial framework featuring endogenous transportation costs and traffic congestion and apply it to evaluate the welfare impact of transportation infrastructure improvements. Our approach yields analytical expressions for transportation costs between any two locations, the traffic along each link of the transportation network, and the equilibrium distribution of economic activity across the economy, each as a function of the underlying quality of infrastructure and the strength of traffic congestion. We characterize the properties of such an equilibrium and show how the framework can be combined with traffic data to evaluate the impact of improving any segment of the infrastructure network. Applying our framework to both the US highway network and the Seattle road network, we find highly variable returns to investment across different links in the respective transportation networks, highlighting the importance of well-targeted infrastructure investment. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email