An official website of the United States government
Student motivation within a STEM course is dependent on their perceived relevance and utility of the topics learned. This paper presents an Informative Utility Value Intervention (IUVI) designed to promote perceptions of utility. The IUVI was designed as a series of assignments for general chemistry students in large lecture courses, but the method can be adapted to other science disciplines. The intervention begins by establishing a baseline of students’ utility-value of chemistry then scaffolds new connections to their field of interest. The scaffold includes directing students to published articles demonstrating real-world connections between topics they are learning and their career interests. Student responses indicate they were able to make connections between the topic and their career interests and they perceived the articles as relevant to their career interests.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on April 8, 2026
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve General Chemistry Students’ Perceptions of the Utility of Chemistry
Chemistry instruction should provide students a rationale for appreciating chemistry as a useful discipline, which is a particular challenge given the diverse student interests within introductory chemistry courses. In this study, we introduce and evaluate an interactive assignment, called an Informative Utility Value Intervention (IUVI), meant to improve students’ perceptions of the utility of chemistry. IUVI provides students with web-based articles describing how chemistry topics are relevant to the students’ chosen career interests. IUVI was administered to second-semester general chemistry students with a quasiexperimental study design in which one section from each instructor was given the intervention, and pre-intervention measures were used to account for potential differences between groups. The results indicate that students who received the intervention reported higher perceptions of the utility of chemistry at the end of the semester and higher scores on a common final exam than students who did not receive the intervention. Results from a structural equation model indicated the IUVI was associated with improved utility perceptions and final exam scores; however, these improvements were potentially independent of each other. Therefore, the theoretical explanation that improved perceptions of utility value resulted in improved academic performance could not be supported. Overall, IUVI offers an effective and highly portable intervention which can be adopted and adapted by instructors to promote students’ utility perceptions of chemistry.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2121416
- PAR ID:
- 10587789
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Chemical Society
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 0021-9584
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1389 to 1397
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)A well-established literature base identifies a portion of students enrolled in post-secondary General Chemistry as at-risk of failing the course based on incoming metrics. Learning about the experiences and factors that lead to this higher failure rate is essential toward improving retention in this course. This study examines the relationship between study habits and academic performance for at-risk students in General Chemistry. Students who were in the bottom quartile of SAT math scores were identified as at-risk students. The study habits of General Chemistry students, both those identified as at-risk and those not identified were measured by text message inquiries. The text message asked ‘‘Have you studied for General Chemistry I in the past 48 hours? If so, how did you study?” twice a week throughout a semester. Student responses to the messages were used to calculate the frequency of studying throughout the term. The results from a multiple regression analysis showed that high frequency of studying could mitigate the difference between at-risk and non-at-risk students on final exam scores. Additionally, the quality of studying for six at-risk students was analyzed by student interviews in concert with their text message responses. The results indicated that the quality of studying is not necessarily linked to frequency of studying and both quality and frequency can play a role in at-risk students' academic performance. The results presented offer a path for at-risk students to succeed in General Chemistry and the methodology presented offers a potential avenue for evaluating future efforts to improve student success.more » « less
-
In this research-based paper, we explore the relationships among Rice University STEM students’ high school preparation, psychological characteristics, and career aspirations. Although greater high school preparation in STEM coursework predicts higher STEM retention and performance in college [1], objective academic preparation and college performance do not fully explain STEM retention decisions, and the students who leave STEM are often not the lowest performing students [2]. Certain psychosocial experiences may also influence students’ STEM decisions. We explored the predictive validity of 1) a STEM diagnostic exam as an objective measure of high school science and math preparation and 2) self-efficacy as a psychological measure on long-term (three years later) STEM career aspirations and STEM identity of underprepared Rice STEM students. University administrators use diagnostic exam scores (along with other evidence of high school underpreparation) to identify students who might benefit from additional support. Using linear regression to explore the link between diagnostic exam scores and self-efficacy, exam scores predicted self-efficacy a semester after students’ first semester in college; exam scores were also marginally correlated with self-efficacy three years later. Early STEM career aspirations predicted later career aspirations, accounting for 21.3% of the variance of career outcome expectations three years later (β=.462, p=.006). Scores on the math diagnostic exam accounted for an additional 10.1% of the variance in students’ three-year STEM career aspirations (p=.041). Self-efficacy after students’ first semester did not predict future STEM aspirations. Early STEM identity explained 28.8% of the variance in three-year STEM identity (p=.001). Math diagnostic exam scores accounted for only marginal incremental variance after STEM identity, and self-efficacy after students’ first semester did not predict three-year STEM aspirations. Overall, we found that the diagnostic exam provided incremental predictive validity in STEM career aspirations after students’ sixth semester of college, indicating that early STEM preparation has long-lasting ramifications for students’ STEM career intentions. Our next steps include examining whether students’ diagnostic exam scores predict STEM graduation rates and final GPAs for science and math versus engineering majors.more » « less
-
NA (Ed.)We conducted two studies to investigate the extent to which brief, spaced, mastery practice on skills relevant to introductory physics affects student performance. The first study investigated the effect of practice of “specific” physics skills, each one relevant to only one or a few items on the course exam. This study employed a quasiexperimental design with 766 students assigned to “intervention” or “control” conditions by lecture section sharing common exams. Results of the first study indicate significant improvement in the performance for only some of the exam items relevant to the specific skills practiced. We also observed between-section performance differences on other exam items not relevant to training, which may be due to specific prior quiz items from individual instructors. The second study investigated the effect of practice on the “general” skill of algebra relevant to introductory physics, a skill which was relevant to most of the exam items. This study employed a similar quasiexperimental design with 363 students assigned to treatment or control conditions, and we also administered a reliable pre- and post-test assessment of the algebra skills that was iteratively developed for this project. Results from the second study indicate that 75% of students had high accuracy on the algebra pretest. Students in the control condition who scored low on the pretest gained about 0.7 standard deviations on the post-test, presumably from engagement with the course alone, and students in the algebra practice condition had statistically similar gains, indicating no observed effect of algebra practice on algebra pre- to post-test gains. In contrast, we find some potential evidence that the algebra practice improved final exam performance for students with high pretest scores and did not benefit students with low pretest scores, although this result is inconclusive: the point estimate of the effect size was 0.24 for high pretest scoring students, but the 95% confidence interval [ , 0.48] slightly overlapped with zero. Further, we find a statistically significant positive effect of algebra practice on exam items that have higher algebraic complexity and no effect for items with low complexity. One possible explanation for the added benefit of algebra practice for high-scoring students is fluency in algebra skills may have improved. Overall, our observations provide some evidence that spaced, mastery practice is beneficial for exam performance for specific and general skills, and that students who are better prepared in algebra may be especially benefitting from mastery practice in relevant algebra skills in terms of improved final exam performance.more » « less
-
We identified opportunity gaps related to prior chemistry preparation for students in introductory biology which were tied to equity gaps in exam scores. We developed, implemented and assessed an intervention to support learning of chemistry-in-biology concepts, and found that mastery and module use mitigated some but not all equity gaps.more » « less
