An official website of the United States government
Uncovering rationales behind predictions of graph neural networks (GNNs) has received increasing attention over recent years. Instance-level GNN explanation aims to discover critical input elements, such as nodes or edges, that the target GNN relies upon for making predictions. Though various algorithms are proposed, most of them formalize this task by searching the minimal subgraph, which can preserve original predictions. However, an inductive bias is deep-rooted in this framework: Several subgraphs can result in the same or similar outputs as the original graphs. Consequently, they have the danger of providing spurious explanations and failing to provide consistent explanations. Applying them to explain weakly performed GNNs would further amplify these issues. To address this problem, we theoretically examine the predictions of GNNs from the causality perspective. Two typical reasons for spurious explanations are identified: confounding effect of latent variables like distribution shift and causal factors distinct from the original input. Observing that both confounding effects and diverse causal rationales are encoded in internal representations,we propose a new explanation framework with an auxiliary alignment loss, which is theoretically proven to be optimizing a more faithful explanation objective intrinsically. Concretely for this alignment loss, a set of different perspectives are explored: anchor-based alignment, distributional alignment based on Gaussian mixture models, mutual-information-based alignment, and so on. A comprehensive study is conducted both on the effectiveness of this new framework in terms of explanation faithfulness/consistency and on the advantages of these variants. For our codes, please refer to the following URL link:https://github.com/TianxiangZhao/GraphNNExplanation
more »
« less
Global Graph Counterfactual Explanation: A Subgraph Mapping Approach
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely deployed in various real-world applications. However, most GNNs are black-box models that lack explanations. One strategy to explain GNNs is through counterfactual explanation, which aims to find minimum perturbations on input graphs that change the GNN predictions. Existing works on GNN counterfactual explanations primarily concentrate on the local-level perspective (i.e., generating counterfactuals for each individual graph), which suffers from information overload and lacks insights into the broader cross-graph relationships. To address such issues, we propose GlobalGCE, a novel global-level graph counterfactual explanation method. GlobalGCE aims to identify a collection of subgraph mapping rules as counterfactual explanations for the target GNN. According to these rules, substituting certain significant subgraphs with their counterfactual subgraphs will change the GNN prediction to the desired class for most graphs (i.e., maximum coverage). Methodologically, we design a significant subgraph generator and a counterfactual subgraph autoencoder in our GlobalGCE, where the subgraphs and the rules can be effectively generated. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our GlobalGCE compared to existing baselines.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10612754
- Publisher / Repository:
- Transactions on Machine Learning Research
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Transactions on machine learning research
- ISSN:
- 2835-8856
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Despite recent progress in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), explaining predictions made by GNNs remains a challenging and nascent problem. The leading method mainly considers the local explanations, i.e., important subgraph structure and node features, to interpret why a GNN model makes the prediction for a single instance, e.g. a node or a graph. As a result, the explanation generated is painstakingly customized at the instance level. The unique explanation interpreting each instance independently is not sufficient to provide a global understanding of the learned GNN model, leading to the lack of generalizability and hindering it from being used in the inductive setting. Besides, training the explanation model explaining for each instance is time-consuming for large-scale real-life datasets. In this study, we address these key challenges and propose PGExplainer, a parameterized explainer for GNNs. PGExplainer adopts a deep neural network to parameterize the generation process of explanations, which renders PGExplainer a natural approach to multi-instance explanations. Compared to the existing work, PGExplainer has better generalization ability and can be utilized in an inductive setting without training the model for new instances. Thus, PGExplainer is much more efficient than the leading method with significant speed-up. In addition, the explanation networks can also be utilized as a regularizer to improve the generalization power of existing GNNs when jointly trained with downstream tasks. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance with up to 24.7% relative improvement in AUC on explaining graph classification over the leading baseline.more » « less
-
Graph neural networks (GNNs) find applications in various domains such as computational biology, natural language processing, and computer security. Owing to their popularity, there is an increasing need to explain GNN predictions since GNNs are black-box machine learning models. One way to address this issue involves usingcounterfactualreasoning where the objective is to alter the GNN prediction by minimal changes in the input graph. Existing methods for counterfactual explanation of GNNs are limited to instance-specificlocalreasoning. This approach has two major limitations of not being able to offer global recourse policies and overloading human cognitive ability with too much information. In this work, we study theglobalexplainability of GNNs through global counterfactual reasoning. Specifically, we want to find asmallset of representative counterfactual graphs that explainsallinput graphs. Toward this goal, we proposeGCFExplainer, a novel algorithm powered byvertex-reinforced random walkson anedit mapof graphs with agreedy summary. Extensive experiments on real graph datasets show that the global explanation fromGCFExplainerprovides important high-level insights of the model behavior and achieves a46.9%gain in recourse coverage, a9.5%reduction in recourse cost compared to the state-of-the-art local counterfactual explainers. We also demonstrate thatGCFExplainergenerates explanations that are more consistent with input dataset characteristics, and is robust under adversarial attacks. In addition,K-GCFExplainer, which incorporates a graph clustering component intoGCFExplainer, is introduced as a more competitive extension for datasets with a clustering structure, leading to superior performance in three out of four datasets in the experiments and better scalability.more » « less
-
Graph rationales are representative subgraph structures that best explain and support the graph neural network (GNN) predictions. Graph rationalization involves the joint identification of these subgraphs during GNN training, resulting in improved interpretability and generalization. GNN is widely used for node-level tasks such as paper classification and graph-level tasks such as molecular property prediction. However, on both levels, little attention has been given to GNN rationalization and the lack of training examples makes it difficult to identify the optimal graph rationales. In this work, we address the problem by proposing a unified data augmentation framework with two novel operations on environment subgraphs to rationalize GNN prediction. We define the environment subgraph as the remaining subgraph after rationale identification and separation. The framework efficiently performs rationale–environment separation in therepresentation spacefor a node’s neighborhood graph or a graph’s complete structure to avoid the high complexity of explicit graph decoding and encoding. We conduct experiments on 17 datasets spanning node classification, graph classification, and graph regression. Results demonstrate that our framework is effective and efficient in rationalizing and enhancing GNNs for different levels of tasks on graphs.more » « less
-
Counterfactual explanations promote explainability in machine learning models by answering the question “how should the input instance be altered to obtain a desired predicted label?". The comparison of this instance before and after perturbation can enhance human interpretation. Most existing studies on counterfactual explanations are limited in tabular data or image data. In this paper, we study the problem of counterfactual explanation generation on graphs. A few studies have explored to generate counterfactual explanations on graphs, but many challenges of this problem are still not well-addressed: 1) optimizing in the discrete and disorganized space of graphs; 2) generalizing on unseen graphs; 3) maintaining the causality in the generated counterfactuals without prior knowledge of the causal model. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel framework CLEAR which aims to generate counterfactual explanations on graphs for graph-level prediction models. Specifically, CLEAR leverages a graph variational autoencoder based mechanism to facilitate its optimization and generalization, and promotes causality by leveraging an auxiliary variable to better identify the causal model. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world graphs validate the superiority of CLEAR over state-of-the-art counterfactual explanation methods on graphs in different aspects.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
