Search for: All records

The title molecule, C₂₂H₆F₈, crystallizes in the monoclinic space groupP2₁/cwith two unique molecules in the asymmetric unit andZ= 8. Each molecule features a short intramolecularsp²-C—H...F hydrogen bond with H...F separations at 2.363 (14) and 2.270 (14) Å, corresponding to 91 and 87.5% of the sum of the van der Waals radii, and C—H...F angles of 158.3 (14) and 166.8 (14)°, respectively. Each molecule also forms an intermolecular bifurcated CH...(F)₂interaction with H...F distances ranging from 2.500 (16) to 2.597 (17) Å. 

ABSTRACT Introduction of Ag(I) cations to 2,6‐bisethynylpyridine units decorated with electron‐donating (N,N‐dimethylaniline) and electron‐accepting (1,3‐dinitrobenzene) groups yields electronic changes consistent with the formation of distinct metal‐organic complexes. Although the formation of these complexes is dynamic—allowing for the possibility of contributors with several different ligand:metal stoichiometries—¹H NMR titration data point to significant contributions from a 2:1 ligand:metal complex. Mutual shielding of the donor and acceptor arms in the 2:1 complex leads to sharp decreases in¹H NMR chemical shifts of hydrogens on these rings. Though the changes in electronic properties and evidence of mutual shielding infer formation of a complex with a close spatial relationship of donor and acceptor units, the electronic effects that would be expected for through‐space charge transfer are not clearly distinguishable from through‐bond electronic effects. Protonation of the central pyridines illuminates how through‐bond interactions of theN,N‐dimethylaniline arms with a positively charged central pyridine tend to dominate the electronic profile of each ligand. X‐ray crystallographic studies of an Ag(I) complex of a donor‐acceptor system illustrate notable contacts betweenN,N‐dimethylaniline and 1,3‐dinitrobenzene units. 

The structures of a series of 2:1 cocrystals formed between 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine and each of 1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-3,6-diiodobenzene, 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆Cl₄I₂, 1,2,4,5-tetrabromo-3,6-diiodobenzene, 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆Br₄I₂, 1-bromo-4-iodo-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzene, 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆BrF₄I, and 1,2-dibromo-4,5-difluoro-3,6-diiodobenzene, 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆Br₂F₂I₂, are reported. In all five structures, the core halogen-bonded 2:1 trimolecular units have geometrically similar parameters, with the central halogen-bond donor flanked by two pyridine halogen-bond acceptors twisted with respect to the central halogen-bond donor at angles ranging from 76 to 86°. The I...N halogen-bond separations are all short, ranging from 73.3 to 76.7% of the sum of the van der Waals radii, while the C—I...N bond angles are essentially linear. The Br...N halogen-bond separation in the cocrystal formed with 1-bromo-4-iodo-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzene is 80.4% of the sum of the van der Waals radii. Subtle differences in the crystal packings are attributed to the role of secondary C—H...π and weak π-type interactions with chloro and bromo substituents. The cocrystals 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆Cl₄I₂and 2C₇H₁₀N₂·C₆Br₄I₂are isomorphous. 

The formation of supramolecular parallelograms utilizing iodoalkyne–pyridine halogen bonding is described. 

The present study evaluates the potential combination of charge-transfer electron-donor–acceptor π–π complexation and C—H hydrogen bonding to form colored cocrystals. The crystal structures of the red 1:1 cocrystals formed from the isomeric pyridines 4- and 3-{2-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]ethynyl}pyridine with 1-[2-(3,5-dinitrophenyl)ethynyl]-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzene, both C 14 H 4 F 4 N 2 O 4 ·C 15 H 14 N 2 , are reported. Intermolecular interaction energy calculations confirm that π-stacking interactions dominate the intermolecular interactions within each crystal structure. The close contacts revealed by Hirshfeld surface calculations are predominantly C—H interactions with N, O, and F atoms. 

Abstract A molecular rotor is created when a 2,1,3‐benzothiadiazole rotator is incorporated into a rigid arylene ethynylene framework supported by pyridine coordination to a metal (Ag⁺or PdCl₂) guest. Comparisons to a similarly sized naphthyl rotator via¹H NMR spectroscopy provide insights into the movement of these bicyclic rotators relative to the rigid stator framework. Chemical shift increases of 0.3 ppm, or more, upon metal complexation are consistent with through‐space interaction of the central arene with a bound PdCl₂guest. Further study via X‐ray crystallography illustrates that rotation of the 2,1,3‐benzothiadiazole unit in the solid state is likely hampered by relatively strong chalcogen bonding (N⋅⋅⋅S distance of 2.93 Å), forming 2S‐2N squares between benzothiadiazoles of neighboring complexes. Strong π–π interactions (3.29–3.36 Å) between neighboring complexes likewise restrict solid‐state rotation of the potential benzothiadiazole rotator. Modest changes to UV–vis spectra upon metal coordination suggest that electronic properties are mostly independent of stator configuration. 

The rapid evaporation of 1:1 solutions of diethynylpyridines and N -halosuccinimides, that react together to form haloalkynes, led to the isolation of unreacted 1:1 cocrystals of the two components. The 1:1 cocrystal formed between 2,6-diethynylpyridine and N -iodosuccinimide (C 4 H 4 INO 2 ·C 9 H 5 N) contains an N -iodosuccinimide–pyridine I...N halogen bond and two terminal alkyne–succinimide carbonyl C—H...O hydrogen bonds. The three-dimensional extended structure features interwoven double-stranded supramolecular polymers that are interconnected through halogen bonds. The cocrystal formed between 3,5-diethynylpyridine and N -iodosuccinimide (C 4 H 4 INO 2 ·C 9 H 5 N) also features an I...N halogen bond and two C—H...O hydrogen bonds. However, the components form essentially planar double-stranded one-dimensional zigzag supramolecular polymers. The cocrystal formed between 3,5-diethynylpyridine and N -bromosuccinimide (C 4 H 4 BrNO 2 ·C 9 H 5 N) is isomorphous to the cocrystal formed between 3,5-diethynylpyridine and N -iodosuccinimide, with a Br...N halogen bond instead of an I...N halogen bond.