Search for: All records

Athermal resistance to the motion of a phase interface due to a precipitate is investigated. The coupled phase field and elasticity equations are solved for the phase transformation (PT). The volumetric misfit strain due to the precipitate is included using the error and rectangular functions. Due to the presence of precipitates, the critical thermal driving forces remarkably differ between the direct and reverse PTs, resulting in a hysteresis behavior. For the precipitate radius small compared to the interface width, the misfit strain does not practically show any effect on the critical thermal driving force. Also, the critical thermal driving force value nonlinearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration for both the direct and reverse PTs. Change in the precipitate surface energy significantly changes the PT morphology and the critical thermal driving forces. The critical thermal driving force shows dependence on the misfit strain for large precipitate sizes compared to the interface width. For both the constant surface energy (CSE) and variable surface energy (VSE) boundary conditions (BCs) at the precipitate surface, the critical thermal driving force linearly increases vs. the misfit strain coefficient for the direct PT while it is almost independent of it for the reverse PT. For larger precipitates, the critical thermal driving force nonlinearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration for the direct PT. For the reverse PT, its value for the CSE BCs linearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration while it is independent of the precipitate concentration for the VSE BCs. Also, for any concentration, the VSE BCs result in higher thermal critical driving forces, a smaller hysteresis range, and a larger transformation rate. The critical microstructure and thermal driving forces are validated using the thermodynamic phase equilibrium condition for stationary interfaces. 

Athermal resistance to the motion of a phase interface due to a precipitate is investigated. The coupled phase field and elasticity equations are solved for the phase transformation (PT). The volumetric misfit strain due to the precipitate is included using the error and rectangular functions. Due to the presence of precipitates, the critical thermal driving forces remarkably differ between the direct and reverse PTs, resulting in a hysteresis behavior. For the precipitate radius small compared to the interface width, the misfit strain does not practically show any effect on the critical thermal driving force. Also, the critical thermal driving force value nonlinearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration for both the direct and reverse PTs. Change in the precipitate surface energy significantly changes the PT morphology and the critical thermal driving forces. The critical thermal driving force shows dependence on the misfit strain for large precipitate sizes compared to the interface width. For both the constant surface energy (CSE) and variable surface energy (VSE) boundary conditions (BCs) at the precipitate surface, the critical thermal driving force linearly increases vs. the misfit strain coefficient for the direct PT while it is almost independent of it for the reverse PT. For larger precipitates, the critical thermal driving force nonlinearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration for the direct PT. For the reverse PT, its value for the CSE BCs linearly increases vs. the precipitate concentration while it is independent of the precipitate concentration for the VSE BCs. Also, for any concentration, the VSE BCs result in higher thermal critical driving forces, a smaller hysteresis range, and a larger transformation rate. The critical microstructure and thermal driving forces are validated using the thermodynamic phase equilibrium condition for stationary interfaces. 

Phase field theory for fracture is developed at large strains with an emphasis on a correct introduction of surface stresses. This is achieved by multiplying the cohesion and gradient energies by the local ratio of the crack surface areas in the deformed and undeformed configurations and with the gradient energy in terms of the gradient of the order parameter in the reference configuration. This results in an expression for the surface stresses which is consistent with the sharp surface approach. Namely, the structural part of the Cauchy surface stress represents an isotropic biaxial tension, with the magnitude of a force per unit length equal to the surface energy. The surface stresses are a result of the geometric nonlinearities, even when strains are infinitesimal. They make multiple contributions to the Ginzburg-Landau equation for damage evolution, both in the deformed and undeformed configurations. Important connections between material parameters are obtained using an analytical solution for two separating surfaces, as well as an analysis of the stress-strain curves for homogeneous tension for different degradation and interpolation functions. A complete system of equations is presented in the undeformed and deformed configurations. All the phase field parameters are obtained utilizing the existing first principle simulations for the uniaxial tension of Si crystal in the [100] and [111] directions. 

The phase field approach (PFA) for the interaction of fracture and martensitic phase transformation (PT) is developed, which includes the change in surface energy during PT and the effect of unexplored scale parameters proportional to the ratio of the widths of the crack surface and the phase interface, both at the nanometer scale. The variation of these two parameters causes unexpected qualitative and quantitative effects: shift of PT away from the crack tip, “wetting” of the crack surface by martensite, change in the structure and geometry of the transformed region, crack trajectory, and process of interfacial damage evolution, as well as transformation toughening. The results suggest additional parameters controlling coupled fracture and PTs.