Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to nonfederal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

We consider the maximum vertexweighted matching problem (MVM), in which nonnegative weights are assigned to the vertices of a graph, and the weight of a matching is the sum of the weights of the matched vertices. Although exact algorithms for MVM are faster than exact algorithms for the maximum edgeweighted matching problem, there are graphs on which these exact algorithms could take hundreds of hours. For a natural number k, we design a k/(k + 1)approximation algorithm for MVM on nonbipartite graphs that updates the matching along certain short paths in the graph: either augmenting paths of length at most 2k + 1 or weightincreasing paths of length at most 2k. The choice of k = 2 leads to a 2/3approximation algorithm that computes nearly optimal weights fast. This algorithm could be initialized with a 2/3approximate maximum cardinality matching to reduce its runtime in practice. A 1/2approximation algorithm may be obtained using k = 1, which is faster than the 2/3approximation algorithm but it computes lower weights. The 2/3approximation algorithm has time complexity O(Δ2m) while the time complexity of the 1/2approximation algorithm is O(Δm), where m is the number of edges and Δ is the maximum degree of a vertex.more »

We consider how to generate graphs of arbitrary size whose chromatic numbers can be chosen (or are wellbounded) for testing graph coloring algorithms on parallel computers. For the distance1 graph coloring problem, we identify three classes of graphs with this property. The first is the ErdősRényi random graph with prescribed expected degree, where the chromatic number is known with high probability. It is also known that the Greedy algorithm colors this graph using at most twice the number of colors as the chromatic number. The second is a random geometric graph embedded in hyperbolic space where the size of the maximum clique provides a tight lower bound on the chromatic number. The third is a deterministic graph described by Mycielski, where the graph is recursively constructed such that its chromatic number is known and increases with graph size, although the size of the maximum clique remains two. For Jacobian estimation, we bound the distance2 chromatic number of random bipartite graphs by considering its equivalence to distance1 coloring of an intersection graph. We use a “balls and bins” probabilistic analysis to establish a lower bound and an upper bound on the distance2 chromatic number. The regimes of graph sizes and probabilitiesmore »

We present the augmented matrix for principal submatrix update (AMPS) algorithm, a finite element solution method that combines principal submatrix updates and Schur complement techniques, wellsuited for interactive simulations of deformation and cutting of finite element meshes. Our approach features realtime solutions to the updated stiffness matrix systems to account for interactive changes in mesh connectivity and boundary conditions. Updates are accomplished by an augmented matrix formulation of the stiffness equations to maintain its consistency with changes to the underlying model without refactorization at each timestep. As changes accumulate over multiple simulation timesteps, the augmented solution algorithm enables tens or hundreds of updates per second. Acceleration schemes that exploit sparsity, memoization and parallelization lead to the updates being computed in realtime. The complexity analysis and experimental results for this method demonstrate that it scales linearly with the number of nonzeros of the factors of the stiffness matrix. Results for cutting and deformation of 3D elastic models are reported for meshes with up to 50,000 nodes, and involve models of surgery for astigmatism and the brain.

We survey recent work on approximation algorithms for computing degreeconstrained subgraphs in graphs and their applications in combinatorial scientific computing. The problems we consider include maximization versions of cardinality matching, edgeweighted matching, vertexweighted matching and edgeweighted $b$ matching, and minimization versions of weighted edge cover and $b$ edge cover. Exact algorithms for these problems are impractical for massive graphs with several millions of edges. For each problem we discuss theoretical foundations, the design of several linear or nearlinear time approximation algorithms, their implementations on serial and parallel computers, and applications. Our focus is on practical algorithms that yield good performance on modern computer architectures with multiple threads and interconnected processors. We also include information about the software available for these problems.

We describe a paradigm for designing parallel algorithms via approximation, and illustrate it on the bedgecover problem. A bedgecover of minimum weight in a graph is a subset $C$ of its edges such that at least a specified number $b(v)$ of edges in $C$ is incident on each vertex $v$, and the sum of the edge weights in $C$ is minimum. The Greedy algorithm and a variant, the LSE algorithm, provide $3/2$approximation guarantees in the worstcase for this problem, but these algorithms have limited parallelism. Hence we design two new $2$approximation algorithms with greater concurrency. The MCE algorithm reduces the computation of a bedgecover to that of finding a b'matching, by exploiting the relationship between these subgraphs in an approximation context. The LSENW is derived from the LSEalgorithm using static edge weights rather than dynamically computing effective edge weights. This relaxation gives LSE a worse approximation guarantee but makes it more amenable to parallelization. We prove that both the MCE and LSENW algorithms compute the same bedgecover with at most twice the weight of the minimum weight edge cover. In practice, the $2$approximation and $3/2$approximation algorithms compute edge covers of weight within $10\%$ the optimal. We implement three of themore »