Search for: All records

Seismic anisotropy is controlled by aligned rock‐forming minerals, which most studies attribute to solid‐state shear with less consideration for magmatic fabric in plutonic rocks (rigid‐body rotation of crystals in the presence of melt). Our study counters this traditional solid‐state bias by evaluating contributions from fossil magmatic fabric. We collected samples from various tectonic settings, identified mineral orientations with electron backscatter diffraction and neutron diffraction, and calculated their bulk rock elastic properties. Results indicate that magmatic fabric may lead to moderate to strong anisotropy (3%–9%), comparable to solid‐state deformation. Also, magmatically aligned feldspar may cause foliation‐perpendicular fast velocity, a unique orientation that contrasts with a fast foliation typical of solid‐state deformation. Therefore, magmatic fabric may be more relevant to seismic anisotropy than previously recognized. Accordingly, increased considerations of magmatic fabric in arcs, batholiths, and other tectonic settings can change and potentially improve the prediction, observation, and interpretation of crustal seismic anisotropy.

 

Deep continental crustal structures are enigmatic due to lack of direct exposures and limited tools to investigate them remotely. Seismic waves can sample these rocks, but most seismic methods focus on coarse crustal structures while laboratory measurements concentrate on crystal‐scale rock properties, and little work has been conducted to bridge this interpretation gap. In some places, geologic maps of crystalline basement provide samples of the intermediate‐scale fabrics and structures that may represent in situ deep crust. However, previous research has not considered natural geometric variations from map data, nor is this heterogeneity typically included in map‐scale seismic property calculations. Here, we test how map‐scale fabrics influence crustal seismic anisotropy in Colorado by analyzing structural data from geologic maps, combining those data with bulk rock elastic tensors to calculate map‐scale seismic properties, and evaluating the resulting comparisons with observed receiver function A1 (360° periodic) arrivals. Crystalline fabrics, predicted seismic properties, and tectonic structures positively correlate with shallow and deep crustal A1 arrivals. Additionally, widespread correlations occur between mapped fault traces and regional foliations, implying that preexisting mechanical heterogeneity may have strongly influenced subsequent reactivation. We interpret that various mapped geologic contact types (e.g., lithologic and structural) generate A1 arrivals and that multiple parallel features (e.g., faults, foliations, and intrusions) contribute to a seismically visible tectonic grain. Therefore, Colorado's exhumed basement, as expressed in outcrops and maps, offers insight into modern deep crustal geological and geophysical structure.

 

The style of convective force transmission to plates and strain‐localization within and underneath plate boundaries remain debated. To address some of the related issues, we analyze a range of deformation indicators in southern California from the surface to the asthenosphere. Present‐day surface strain rates can be inferred from geodesy. At seismogenic crustal depths, stress can be inferred from focal mechanisms and splitting of shear waves from local earthquakes via crack‐dependent seismic velocities. At greater depths, constraints on rock fabrics are obtained from receiver function anisotropy,P_nandPtomography, surface wave tomography, and splitting ofSKSand other teleseismic core phases. We construct a synthesis of deformation‐related observations focusing on quantitative comparisons of deformation style. We find consistency with roughly N‐S compression and E‐W extension near the surface and in the asthenospheric mantle. However, all lithospheric anisotropy indicators show deviations from this pattern.P_nfast axes and dipping foliations from receiver functions are fault‐parallel with no localization to fault traces and match post‐Farallon block rotations in the Western Transverse Ranges. Local shear wave splitting orientations deviate from the stress orientations inferred from focal mechanisms in significant portions of the area. We interpret these observations as an indication that lithospheric fabric, developed during Farallon subduction and subsequent extension, has not been completely reset by present‐day transform motion and may influence the current deformation behavior. This provides a new perspective on the timescales of deformation memory and lithosphere‐asthenosphere interactions.

 

Plate motions in Southern California have undergone a transition from compressional and extensional regimes to a dominantly strike‐slip regime in the Miocene. Strike‐slip motion is most easily accommodated on vertical faults, and major transform fault strands in the region are typically mapped as near vertical on the surface. However, some previous work suggests that these faults have a dipping geometry at depth. We analyze receiver function arrivals that vary harmonically with back azimuth at all available broadband stations in the region. The results show a dominant signal from contrasts in dipping foliation as well as dipping isotropic velocity contrasts from all crustal depths, including from the ductile middle to lower crust. We interpret these receiver function observations as a dipping fault‐parallel structural fabric that is pervasive throughout the region. The strike of these structures and fabrics is parallel to that of nearby fault surface traces. We also plot microseismicity on depth profiles perpendicular to major strike‐slip faults and find consistently NE dipping features in seismicity changing from near vertical (80–85°) on the Elsinore Fault in the Peninsular Ranges to 60–65° slightly further inland on the San Jacinto Fault to 50–55° on the San Andreas Fault. Taken together, the dipping features in seismicity and in rock fabric suggest that preexisting fabrics and faults may have acted as strain guides in the modern slip regime, with reactivation and growth of strike‐slip faults along northeast dipping fabrics both above and below the brittle‐ductile transition.

 

Abstract As North America collided with Africa to form Pangea during the Alleghanian orogeny, crystalline and sedimentary rocks in the southeastern United States were thrust forelandward along the Appalachian décollement. We examined Ps receiver functions to better constrain the kinematics of this prominent subsurface structure. From Southeastern Suture of the Appalachian Margin Experiment (SESAME) and other EarthScope stations on the Blue Ridge–Piedmont crystalline megathrust, we find large arrivals from a 5–10-km-deep converter. We argue that a strong contrast in dipping anisotropic foliation occurs at the subhorizontal Appalachian décollement, and propose that such a geometry may be typical for décollement structures. Conversion polarity flips can be explained by an east-dipping foliation, but this orientation is at odds with the overlying northeast-trending surface tectonic grain. We suggest that prior to late Alleghanian northwest-directed head-on collision, the Appalachian décollement accommodated early Alleghanian west-vergence, independent of the overlying Blue Ridge–Piedmont structural inheritance. The geophysical expression of dipping anisotropic foliation provides a powerful tool for investigating subsurface kinematics, especially where they are obscured by overlying fabric, to disentangle the tectonic complexities that embody oblique collisional orogens. 

Abstract Azimuthal variations in receiver function conversions can image lithospheric structural contrasts and anisotropic fabrics that together compose tectonic grain. We apply this method to data from EarthScope Transportable Array in Alaska and additional stations across the northern Cordillera. The best-resolved quantities are the strike and depth of dipping fabric contrasts or interfaces. We find a strong geographic gradient in such anomalies, with large amplitudes extending inboard from the present-day subduction margin, the Aleutian arc, and an influence of flat-slab subduction of the Yakutat microplate north of the Denali fault. An east–west band across interior Alaska shows low-amplitude crustal anomalies. Anomaly amplitudes correlate with structural intensity (density of aligned geological elements), but are the highest in areas of strong Cenozoic deformation, raising the question of an influence of current stress state. Imaged subsurface strikes show alignment with surface structures. We see concentric strikes around arc volcanoes implying dipping magmatic structures and fabric into the middle crust. Regions with present-day weaker deformation show lower anomaly amplitudes but structurally aligned strikes, suggesting pre-Cenozoic fabrics may have been overprinted or otherwise modified. We observe general coherence of the signal across the brittle-plastic transition. Imaged crustal fabrics are aligned with major faults and shear zones, whereas intrafault blocks show imaged strikes both parallel to and at high angles to major block-bounding faults. High-angle strikes are subparallel to neotectonic deformation, seismicity, fault lineaments, and prominent metallogenic belts, possibly due to overprinting and/or co-evolution with fault-parallel fabrics. We suggest that the underlying tectonic grain in the northern Cordillera is broadly distributed rather than strongly localized. Receiver functions thus reveal key information about the nature and continuity of tectonic fabrics at depth and can provide unique insights into the deformation history and distribution of regional strain in complex orogenic belts.