skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Why Are Stratospheric Sudden Warmings Sudden (and Intermittent)?
This paper examines the role of wave–mean flow interaction in the onset and suddenness of stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs). Evidence is presented that SSWs are, on average, a threshold behavior of finite-amplitude Rossby waves arising from the competition between an increasing wave activity A and a decreasing zonal-mean zonal wind [Formula: see text]. The competition puts a limit to the wave activity flux that a stationary Rossby wave can transmit upward. A rapid, spontaneous vortex breakdown occurs once the upwelling wave activity flux reaches the limit, or equivalently, once [Formula: see text] drops below a certain fraction of u REF , a wave-free, reference-state wind inverted from the zonalized quasigeostrophic potential vorticity. This fraction is 0.5 in theory and about 0.3 in reanalyses. We propose [Formula: see text] as a local, instantaneous measure of the proximity to vortex breakdown (i.e., preconditioning). The ratio r generally stays above the threshold during strong-vortex winters until a pronounced final warming, whereas during weak-vortex winters it approaches the threshold early in the season, culminating in a precipitous drop in midwinter as SSWs form. The essence of the threshold behavior is captured by a semiempirical 1D model of SSWs, similar to the “traffic jam” model of Nakamura and Huang for atmospheric blocking. This model predicts salient features of SSWs including rapid vortex breakdown and downward migration of the wave activity/zonal wind anomalies, with analytical expressions for the respective time scales. The model’s response to a variety of transient wave forcing and damping is discussed.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1909522
PAR ID:
10163332
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Volume:
77
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0022-4928
Page Range / eLocation ID:
943 to 964
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Zenodo)
    The European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) data set (1979 – 2020) is used in many climate studies.  The present monthly mean data set of Eliassen-Palm fluxes (EP fluxes) and EP flux divergences, was created from twice-daily gridded values of ERA5 winds and temperature on pressure surfaces and is intended to fill a gap in availability.   It is compatible for use with ERA5 monthly mean data.   The EP flux is a diagnostic tool for assessing wave propagation and wave-mean flow interaction. It is a vector representation for the propagation of synoptic and planetary Rossby wave activity in the meridional plane.  An upward component indicates a poleward heat flux while an equatorward component indicates a poleward momentum flux.   EP flux divergence implies a source of Rossby wave activity, and EP flux convergence implies absorption of Rossby wave activity.  EP flux divergence represents the body force, or net effect of waves on the zonal mean zonal wind, with EP flux convergence causing deceleration of zonal mean westerlies and EP flux divergence causing acceleration. The primary effect of a region of EP flux convergence, however, is to induce poleward motion, with an associated mean meridional circulation and quadrupole of temperature anomalies in the meridional plane. EP fluxes are useful in investigating many planetary and synoptic scale weather phenomena such as the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs).   The meridional and vertical components of the EP flux are calculated in pressure coordinates using the following initial conditions:  Ground density (rho_0 ):P_0/R_0/T_0 Ground pressure (P_0): 1013hPa Ground temperature (T_0): Temperature at 1000hPa Earth radius (a) = 6378km   Dimensions in the data: Latitude: 90°N-90°S (grid spacing is 0.25°, as in the ERA5 reanalysis)  Pressure: 1 hPa-1000 hPa (levels are the same as in the ERA5 reanalysis)  Time: January 1979 – December 2020; December, January, February (DJF) only; 00z and 12z 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. Stratospheric circulation is a critical part of the Arctic ozone cycle.Sudden stratospheric warming events (SSWs) manifest the strongest alterationof stratospheric dynamics. During SSWs, changes in planetary wavepropagation vigorously influence zonal mean zonal wind, temperature, andtracer concentrations in the stratosphere over the high latitudes. In thisstudy, we examine six persistent major SSWs from 2004 to 2020 using theModern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2(MERRA-2). Using the unique density of observations around the Greenlandsector at high latitudes, we perform comprehensive comparisons of high-latitude observations with the MERRA-2 ozone dataset during the six majorSSWs. Our results show that MERRA-2 captures the high variability of mid-stratospheric ozone fluctuations during SSWs over high latitudes. However,larger uncertainties are observed in the lower stratosphere and troposphere.The zonally averaged stratospheric ozone shows a dramatic increase of9 %–29 % in total column ozone (TCO) near the time of each SSW, which lastsup to 2 months. This study shows that the average shape of the Arcticpolar vortex before SSWs influences the geographical extent, timing, andmagnitude of ozone changes. The SSWs exhibit a more significant impact onozone over high northern latitudes when the average polar vortex is mostlyelongated as seen in 2009 and 2018 compared to the events in which the polarvortex is displaced towards Europe. Strong correlation (R2=90  %) isobserved between the magnitude of change in average equivalent potentialvorticity before and after SSWs and the associated averaged total columnozone changes over high latitudes. This paper investigates the differentterms of the ozone continuity equation using MERRA-2 circulation, whichemphasizes the key role of vertical advection in mid-stratospheric ozoneduring the SSWs and the magnified vertical advection in elongated vortexshape as seen in 2009 and 2018. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model, version 4 (WACCM4), is used to investigate the influence of stratospheric conditions on the development of sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs). To this end, targeted experiments are performed on selected modeled SSW events. Specifically, the model is reinitialized three weeks before a given SSW, relaxing the surface fluxes, winds, and temperature below 10 km to the corresponding fields from the free-running simulation. Hence, the tropospheric wave evolution is unaltered across the targeted experiments, but the stratosphere itself can evolve freely. The stratospheric zonal-mean state is then altered 21 days prior to the selected SSWs and rerun with an ensemble of different initial conditions. It is found that a given tropospheric evolution concomitant with the development of an SSW does not uniquely determine the occurrence of an event and that the stratospheric conditions are relevant to the subsequent evolution of the stratospheric flow toward an SSW, even for a fixed tropospheric evolution. It is also shown that interpreting the meridional heat flux at 100 hPa as a proxy of the tropospheric injection of wave activity into the stratosphere should be regarded with caution and that stratospheric dynamics critically influence the heat flux at that altitude. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Climate)
    The tropospheric response to midwinter sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) is examined using an idealized model. SSW events are triggered by imposing high-latitude stratospheric heating perturbations of varying magnitude for only a few days, spun off from a free-running control integration (CTRL). The evolution of the thermally triggered SSWs is then compared with naturally occurring SSWs identified in CTRL. By applying a heating perturbation, with no modification to the momentum budget, it is possible to isolate the tropospheric response directly attributable to a change in the stratospheric polar vortex, independent of any planetary wave momentum torques involved in the initiation of an SSW. Zonal-wind anomalies associated with the thermally triggered SSWs first propagate downward to the high-latitude troposphere after ~2 weeks, before migrating equatorward and stalling at midlatitudes, where they straddle the near-surface jet. After ~3 weeks, the circulation and eddy fluxes associated with thermally triggered SSWs evolve very similarly to SSWs in CTRL, despite the lack of initial planetary wave driving. This suggests that at longer lags, the tropospheric response to SSWs is generic and it is found to be linearly governed by the strength of the lower-stratospheric warming, whereas at shorter lags, the initial formation of the SSW potentially plays a large role in the downward coupling. In agreement with previous studies, synoptic waves are found to play a key role in the persistent tropospheric jet shift at long lags. Synoptic waves appear to respond to the enhanced midlatitude baroclinicity associated with the tropospheric jet shift, and preferentially propagate poleward in an apparent positive feedback with changes in the high-latitude refractive index. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences)
    We consider the relevance of known constraints from each of Hide’s theorem, the angular momentum–conserving (AMC) model, and the equal-area model on the extent of cross-equatorial Hadley cells. These theories respectively posit that a Hadley circulation must span all latitudes where the radiative–convective equilibrium (RCE) absolute angular momentum [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] or where the RCE absolute vorticity [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text]; all latitudes where the RCE zonal wind exceeds the AMC zonal wind; and over a range such that depth-averaged potential temperature is continuous and that energy is conserved. The AMC model requires knowledge of the ascent latitude [Formula: see text], which needs not equal the RCE forcing maximum latitude [Formula: see text]. Whatever the value of [Formula: see text], we demonstrate that an AMC cell must extend at least as far into the winter hemisphere as the summer hemisphere. The equal-area model predicts [Formula: see text], always placing it poleward of [Formula: see text]. As [Formula: see text] is moved poleward (at a given thermal Rossby number), the equal-area-predicted Hadley circulation becomes implausibly large, while both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] become increasingly displaced poleward of the minimal cell extent based on Hide’s theorem (i.e., of supercritical forcing). In an idealized dry general circulation model, cross-equatorial Hadley cells are generated, some spanning nearly pole to pole. All homogenize angular momentum imperfectly, are roughly symmetric in extent about the equator, and appear in extent controlled by the span of supercritical forcing. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email