skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Vertical dependence of horizontal variation of cloud microphysics: observations from the ACE-ENA field campaign and implications for warm-rain simulation in climate models
Title: Vertical dependence of horizontal variation of cloud microphysics: observations from the ACE-ENA field campaign and implications for warm-rain simulation in climate models
Abstract. In the current global climate models (GCMs), the nonlinearity effect ofsubgrid cloud variations on the parameterization of warm-rain process, e.g.,the autoconversion rate, is often treated by multiplying the resolved-scalewarm-rain process rates by a so-called enhancement factor (EF). In thisstudy, we investigate the subgrid-scale horizontal variations andcovariation of cloud water content (qc) and cloud droplet numberconcentration (Nc) in marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds based on thein situ measurements from a recent field campaign and study the implicationsfor the autoconversion rate EF in GCMs. Based on a few carefully selectedcases from the field campaign, we found that in contrast to the enhancingeffect of qc and Nc variations that tends to make EF > 1, the strong positive correlation between qc and Nc results in asuppressing effect that tends to make EF < 1. This effect isespecially strong at cloud top, where the qc and Nc correlation canbe as high as 0.95. We also found that the physically complete EF thataccounts for the covariation of qc and Nc is significantly smallerthan its counterpart that accounts only for the subgrid variation ofqc, especially at cloud top. Although this study is based on limitedcases, it suggests that the subgrid variations of Nc and itscorrelation with qc both need to be considered for an accuratesimulation of the autoconversion process in GCMs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1700728
PAR ID:
10293659
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume:
21
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1680-7324
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3103 to 3121
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. One of the challenges inrepresenting warm rain processes in global climate models (GCMs) is relatedto the representation of the subgrid variability of cloud properties, such ascloud water and cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC), and the effectthereof on individual precipitation processes such as autoconversion. Thiseffect is conventionally treated by multiplying the resolved-scale warm rainprocess rates by an enhancement factor (Eq) which is derived fromintegrating over an assumed subgrid cloud water distribution. The assumedsubgrid cloud distribution remains highly uncertain. In this study, we derivethe subgrid variations of liquid-phase cloud properties over the tropicalocean using the satellite remote sensing products from Moderate ResolutionImaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and investigate the correspondingenhancement factors for the GCM parameterization of autoconversion rate. Wefind that the conventional approach of using only subgrid variability ofcloud water is insufficient and that the subgrid variability of CDNC, as wellas the correlation between the two, is also important for correctlysimulating the autoconversion process in GCMs. Using the MODIS data whichhave near-global data coverage, we find that Eq shows a strongdependence on cloud regimes due to the fact that the subgrid variability ofcloud water and CDNC is regime dependent. Our analysis shows a significantincrease of Eq from the stratocumulus (Sc) to cumulus (Cu) regions.Furthermore, the enhancement factor EN due to the subgrid variation ofCDNC is derived from satellite observation for the first time, and resultsreveal several regions downwind of biomass burning aerosols (e.g., Gulf ofGuinea, east coast of South Africa), air pollution (i.e., East China Sea),and active volcanos (e.g., Kilauea, Hawaii, and Ambae, Vanuatu), where theEN is comparable to or even larger than Eq, suggesting an importantrole of aerosol in influencing the EN. MODIS observations suggest thatthe subgrid variations of cloud liquid water path (LWP) and CDNC aregenerally positively correlated. As a result, the combined enhancementfactor, including the effect of LWP and CDNC correlation, is significantlysmaller than the simple product of Eq⋅EN. Given the importanceof warm rain processes in understanding the Earth's system dynamics and watercycle, we conclude that more observational studies are needed to provide abetter constraint on the warm rain processes in GCMs. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. There has been a growing concern that most climate models predict precipitation that is too frequent, likely due to lack of reliable subgrid variabilityand vertical variations in microphysical processes in low-level warm clouds.In this study, the warm-cloud physics parameterizations in the singe-columnconfigurations of NCAR Community Atmospheric Model version 6 and 5 (SCAM6and SCAM5, respectively) are evaluated using ground-based and airborneobservations from the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the EasternNorth Atlantic (ACE-ENA) field campaign near the Azores islands during2017–2018. The 8-month single-column model (SCM) simulations show that both SCAM6 and SCAM5 cangenerally reproduce marine boundary layer cloud structure, majormacrophysical properties, and their transition. The improvement in warm-cloud properties from the Community Atmospheric Model 5 and 6 (CAM5 to CAM6) physics can be found through comparison with the observations. Meanwhile, both physical schemes underestimate cloud liquidwater content, cloud droplet size, and rain liquid water content butoverestimate surface rainfall. Modeled cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)concentrations are comparable with aircraft-observed ones in the summer but areoverestimated by a factor of 2 in winter, largely due to the biases in thelong-range transport of anthropogenic aerosols like sulfate. We also testthe newly recalibrated autoconversion and accretion parameterizations thataccount for vertical variations in droplet size. Compared to theobservations, more significant improvement is found in SCAM5 than in SCAM6.This result is likely explained by the introduction of subgrid variationsin cloud properties in CAM6 cloud microphysics, which further suppresses thescheme's sensitivity to individual warm-rain microphysical parameters. Thepredicted cloud susceptibilities to CCN perturbations in CAM6 are within areasonable range, indicating significant progress since CAM5 which produces anaerosol indirect effect that is too strong. The present study emphasizes theimportance of understanding biases in cloud physics parameterizations bycombining SCM with in situ observations. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract. A great challenge in climate modeling is how to parameterizesubgrid cloud processes, such as autoconversion and accretion in warm-rainformation. In this study, we use ground-based observations and retrievalsover the Azores to investigate the so-called enhancement factors,Eauto and Eaccr, which are often used in climate modelsto account for the influence of subgrid variance of cloud and precipitationwater on the autoconversion and accretion processes. Eauto andEaccr are computed for different equivalent model grid sizes. Thecalculated Eauto values increase from 1.96 (30 km) to 3.2(180 km), and the calculated Eaccr values increase from 1.53(30 km) to 1.76 (180 km). Comparing the prescribed enhancement factors inMorrison and Gettleman (2008, MG08) to the observed ones, we found that ahigher Eauto (3.2) at small grids and lower Eaccr (1.07)are used in MG08, which might explain why most of the general circulation models (GCMs) producetoo-frequent precipitation events but with too-light precipitation intensity. Theratios of the rain to cloud water mixing ratio (qr/qc) at Eaccr=1.07 andEaccr=2.0 are 0.063 and 0.142, respectively, from observations,further suggesting that the prescribed value of Eaccr=1.07 used inMG08 is too small to simulate precipitation intensity correctly. BothEauto and Eaccr increase when the boundary layer becomesless stable, and the values are larger in precipitating clouds (CLWP>75 gm−2) than those in non-precipitating clouds (CLWP<75 gm−2). Therefore, the selection of Eauto andEaccr values in GCMs should be regime- and resolution-dependent. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Sub-cloud rain evaporation in the trade wind region significantly influences the boundary layer mass and energy budgets. Parameterizing it is, however, difficult due to the sparsity of well-resolved rain observations and the challenges of sampling short-lived marine cumulus clouds. In this study, sub-cloud rain evaporation is analyzed using a steady-state, one-dimensional model that simulates changes in drop sizes, relative humidity, and rain isotopic composition. The model is initialized with relative humidity, raindrop size distributions, and water vapor isotope ratios (e.g., δDv, δ18Ov) sampled by the NOAA P3 aircraft during the Atlantic Tradewind Ocean–Atmosphere Mesoscale Interaction Campaign (ATOMIC), which was part of the larger EUREC4A (ElUcidating the RolE of Clouds–Circulation Coupling in ClimAte) field program. The modeled surface precipitation isotope ratios closely match the observations from EUREC4A ground-based and ship-based platforms, lending credibility to our model. The model suggests that 63 % of the rain mass evaporates in the sub-cloud layer across 22 P3 cases. The vertical distribution of the evaporated rain flux is top heavy for a narrow (σ) raindrop size distribution (RSD) centered over a small geometric mean diameter (Dg) at the cloud base. A top-heavy profile has a higher rain-evaporated fraction (REF) and larger changes in the rain deuterium excess (d=δD-8×δ18O) between the cloud base and the surface than a bottom-heavy profile, which results from a wider RSD with larger Dg. The modeled REF and change in d are also more strongly influenced by cloud base Dg and σ rather than the concentration of raindrops. The model results are accurate as long as the variations in the relative humidity conditions are accounted for. Relative humidity alone, however, is a poor indicator of sub-cloud rain evaporation. Overall, our analysis indicates the intricate dependence of sub-cloud rain evaporation on both thermodynamic and microphysical processes in the trade wind region. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Journal of Climate)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract In this study, more than 4 years of ground-based observations and retrievals were collected and analyzed to investigate the seasonal and diurnal variations of single-layered MBL (with three subsets: nondrizzling, virga, and rain) cloud and drizzle properties, as well as their vertical and horizontal variations. The annual mean drizzle frequency was ~55%, with ~70% in winter and ~45% in summer. The cloud-top (cloud-base) height for rain clouds was the highest (lowest), resulting in the deepest cloud layer, i.e., 0.8 km, which is 4 (2) times that of nondrizzling (virga) clouds. The retrieved cloud-droplet effective radii r c were the largest (smallest) for rain (nondrizzling) clouds, and the nighttime values were greater than the daytime values. Drizzle number concentration N d and liquid water content LWC d were three orders and one order lower, respectively, than their cloud counterparts. The r c and LWC c increased from the cloud base to z i ≈ 0.75 by condensational growth, while drizzle median radii r d increased from the cloud top downward the cloud base by collision–coalescence. The adiabaticity values monotonically increased from the cloud top to the cloud base with maxima of ~0.7 (0.3) for nondrizzling (rain) clouds. The drizzling process decreases the adiabaticity by 0.25 to 0.4, and the cloud-top entrainment mixing impacts as deep as upper 40% of the cloud layers. Cloud and drizzle homogeneities decreased with increased horizontal sampling lengths. Cloud homogeneity increases with increasing cloud fraction. These results can serve as baselines for studying MBL cloud-to-rain conversion and growth processes over the Azores. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email