More Like this

1. Training Quantum Boltzmann Machines with Coresets

   https://doi.org/10.1109/QCE53715.2022.00049  

   Viszlai, Joshua ; Tomesh, Teague ; Gokhale, Pranav ; Anschuetz, Eric ; Chong, Frederic T. ( September 2022 , 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE))

   Recent work has proposed and explored using coreset techniques for quantum algorithms that operate on classical data sets to accelerate the applicability of these algorithms on near-term quantum devices. We apply these ideas to Quantum Boltzmann Machines (QBM) where gradient-based steps which require Gibbs state sampling are the main computational bottle-neck during training. By using a coreset in place of the full data set, we try to minimize the number of steps needed and accelerate the overall training time. In a regime where computational time on quantum computers is a precious resource, we propose this might lead to substantial practical savings. We evaluate this approach on 6x6 binary images from an augmented bars and stripes data set using a QBM with 36 visible units and 8 hidden units. Using an Inception score inspired metric, we compare QBM training times with and without using coresets.
2. Tree Based Clustering On Large, High Dimensional Datasets

   Carraher, Lee A. ; Dey, Sayantan ; Wilsey, Philip A. ( July 2019 , MLDM 2019: 15th International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining)

   Clustering continues to be an important tool for data engineering and analysis. While advances in deep learning tend to be at the forefront of machine learning, it is only useful for the supervised classification of data sets. Clustering is an essential tool for problems where labeling data sets is either too labor intensive or where there is no agreed upon ground truth. The well studied k-means problem partitions groups of similar vectors into k clusters by iteratively updating the cluster assignment such that it minimizes the within cluster sum of squares metric. Unfortunately k-means can become prohibitive for very large high dimensional data sets as iterative methods often rely on random access to, or multiple passes over, the data set — a requirement that is not often possible for large and potentially unbounded data sets. In this work we explore an randomized, approximate method for clustering called Tree-Walk Random Projection Clustering (TWRP) that is a fast, memory efficient method for finding cluster embedding in high dimensional spaces. TWRP combines random projection with a tree based partitioner to achieve a clustering method that forgoes storing the exhaustive representation of all vectors in the data space and instead performs a bounded searchmore »over the implied cluster bifurcation tree represented as approximate vector and count values. The TWRP algorithm is described and experimentally evaluated for scalability and accuracy in the presence of noise against several other well-known algorithms.« less
3. How many qubits are needed for quantum computational supremacy?

   https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-05-11-264  

   Dalzell, Alexander M. ; Harrow, Aram W. ; Koh, Dax Enshan ; La Placa, Rolando L. ( May 2020 , Quantum)

   Quantum computational supremacy arguments, which describe a way for a quantum computer to perform a task that cannot also be done by a classical computer, typically require some sort of computational assumption related to the limitations of classical computation. One common assumption is that the polynomial hierarchy ( P H ) does not collapse, a stronger version of the statement that P ≠ N P , which leads to the conclusion that any classical simulation of certain families of quantum circuits requires time scaling worse than any polynomial in the size of the circuits. However, the asymptotic nature of this conclusion prevents us from calculating exactly how many qubits these quantum circuits must have for their classical simulation to be intractable on modern classical supercomputers. We refine these quantum computational supremacy arguments and perform such a calculation by imposing fine-grained versions of the non-collapse conjecture. Our first two conjectures poly3-NSETH( a ) and per-int-NSETH( b ) take specific classical counting problems related to the number of zeros of a degree-3 polynomial in n variables over F 2 or the permanent of an n × n integer-valued matrix, and assert that any non-deterministic algorithm that solves them requires 2 c nmore »time steps, where c ∈ { a , b } . A third conjecture poly3-ave-SBSETH( a ′ ) asserts a similar statement about average-case algorithms living in the exponential-time version of the complexity class S B P . We analyze evidence for these conjectures and argue that they are plausible when a = 1 / 2 , b = 0.999 and a ′ = 1 / 2 .Imposing poly3-NSETH(1/2) and per-int-NSETH(0.999), and assuming that the runtime of a hypothetical quantum circuit simulation algorithm would scale linearly with the number of gates/constraints/optical elements, we conclude that Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-Time (IQP) circuits with 208 qubits and 500 gates, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) circuits with 420 qubits and 500 constraints and boson sampling circuits (i.e. linear optical networks) with 98 photons and 500 optical elements are large enough for the task of producing samples from their output distributions up to constant multiplicative error to be intractable on current technology. Imposing poly3-ave-SBSETH(1/2), we additionally rule out simulations with constant additive error for IQP and QAOA circuits of the same size. Without the assumption of linearly increasing simulation time, we can make analogous statements for circuits with slightly fewer qubits but requiring 10 4 to 10 7 gates.« less
4. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk3333  

   Huang, Hsin-Yuan ; Kueng, Richard ; Torlai, Giacomo ; Albert, Victor V. ; Preskill, John ( September 2022 , Science)

   INTRODUCTION Solving quantum many-body problems, such as finding ground states of quantum systems, has far-reaching consequences for physics, materials science, and chemistry. Classical computers have facilitated many profound advances in science and technology, but they often struggle to solve such problems. Scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computers will be able to solve a broad array of quantum problems but are unlikely to be available for years to come. Meanwhile, how can we best exploit our powerful classical computers to advance our understanding of complex quantum systems? Recently, classical machine learning (ML) techniques have been adapted to investigate problems in quantum many-body physics. So far, these approaches are mostly heuristic, reflecting the general paucity of rigorous theory in ML. Although they have been shown to be effective in some intermediate-size experiments, these methods are generally not backed by convincing theoretical arguments to ensure good performance. RATIONALE A central question is whether classical ML algorithms can provably outperform non-ML algorithms in challenging quantum many-body problems. We provide a concrete answer by devising and analyzing classical ML algorithms for predicting the properties of ground states of quantum systems. We prove that these ML algorithms can efficiently and accurately predict ground-state properties of gapped local Hamiltonians,more »after learning from data obtained by measuring other ground states in the same quantum phase of matter. Furthermore, under a widely accepted complexity-theoretic conjecture, we prove that no efficient classical algorithm that does not learn from data can achieve the same prediction guarantee. By generalizing from experimental data, ML algorithms can solve quantum many-body problems that could not be solved efficiently without access to experimental data. RESULTS We consider a family of gapped local quantum Hamiltonians, where the Hamiltonian H ( x ) depends smoothly on m parameters (denoted by x ). The ML algorithm learns from a set of training data consisting of sampled values of x , each accompanied by a classical representation of the ground state of H ( x ). These training data could be obtained from either classical simulations or quantum experiments. During the prediction phase, the ML algorithm predicts a classical representation of ground states for Hamiltonians different from those in the training data; ground-state properties can then be estimated using the predicted classical representation. Specifically, our classical ML algorithm predicts expectation values of products of local observables in the ground state, with a small error when averaged over the value of x . The run time of the algorithm and the amount of training data required both scale polynomially in m and linearly in the size of the quantum system. Our proof of this result builds on recent developments in quantum information theory, computational learning theory, and condensed matter theory. Furthermore, under the widely accepted conjecture that nondeterministic polynomial-time (NP)–complete problems cannot be solved in randomized polynomial time, we prove that no polynomial-time classical algorithm that does not learn from data can match the prediction performance achieved by the ML algorithm. In a related contribution using similar proof techniques, we show that classical ML algorithms can efficiently learn how to classify quantum phases of matter. In this scenario, the training data consist of classical representations of quantum states, where each state carries a label indicating whether it belongs to phase A or phase B . The ML algorithm then predicts the phase label for quantum states that were not encountered during training. The classical ML algorithm not only classifies phases accurately, but also constructs an explicit classifying function. Numerical experiments verify that our proposed ML algorithms work well in a variety of scenarios, including Rydberg atom systems, two-dimensional random Heisenberg models, symmetry-protected topological phases, and topologically ordered phases. CONCLUSION We have rigorously established that classical ML algorithms, informed by data collected in physical experiments, can effectively address some quantum many-body problems. These rigorous results boost our hopes that classical ML trained on experimental data can solve practical problems in chemistry and materials science that would be too hard to solve using classical processing alone. Our arguments build on the concept of a succinct classical representation of quantum states derived from randomized Pauli measurements. Although some quantum devices lack the local control needed to perform such measurements, we expect that other classical representations could be exploited by classical ML with similarly powerful results. How can we make use of accessible measurement data to predict properties reliably? Answering such questions will expand the reach of near-term quantum platforms. Classical algorithms for quantum many-body problems. Classical ML algorithms learn from training data, obtained from either classical simulations or quantum experiments. Then, the ML algorithm produces a classical representation for the ground state of a physical system that was not encountered during training. Classical algorithms that do not learn from data may require substantially longer computation time to achieve the same task.« less
5. Algorithms for covering multiple submodular constraints and applications

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-022-00874-x  

   Chekuri, Chandra ; Inamdar, Tanmay ; Quanrud, Kent ; Varadarajan, Kasturi ; Zhang, Zhao ( June 2022 , Journal of Combinatorial Optimization)

   We consider the problem of covering multiple submodular constraints. Given a finite ground setN, a weight function$$w: N \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$$$w:N\to R_{+}$,rmonotone submodular functions$$f_1,f_2,\ldots ,f_r$$$f_1,f_2,\dots ,f_r$overNand requirements$$k_1,k_2,\ldots ,k_r$$$k_1,k_2,\dots ,k_r$the goal is to find a minimum weight subset$$S \subseteq N$$$S\subseteq N$such that$$f_i(S) \ge k_i$$$f_i\left(S\right)\ge k_i$for$$1 \le i \le r$$$1\le i\le r$. We refer to this problem asMulti-Submod-Coverand it was recently considered by Har-Peled and Jones (Few cuts meet many point sets. CoRR.arxiv:abs1808.03260Har-Peled and Jones 2018) who were motivated by an application in geometry. Even with$$r=1$$$r=1$Multi-Submod-Covergeneralizes the well-known Submodular Set Cover problem (Submod-SC), and it can also be easily reduced toSubmod-SC. A simple greedy algorithm gives an$$O(\log (kr))$$$O(log(kr\left)\right)$approximation where$$k = \sum _i k_i$$$k={\sum }_i{k}_i$and this ratio cannot be improved in the general case. In this paper, motivated by several concrete applications, we consider two ways to improve upon the approximation given by the greedy algorithm. First, we give a bicriteria approximation algorithm forMulti-Submod-Coverthat covers each constraint to within a factor of$$(1-1/e-\varepsilon )$$$(1-1/e-\epsilon )$while incurring an approximation of$$O(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\log r)$$$O(\frac{1}{ϵ}logr)$in the cost. Second, we consider the special case when each$$f_i$$$f_i$is a obtained from a truncated coverage function and obtain an algorithm that generalizes previous work on partial set cover (Partial-SC), covering integer programs (CIPs) and multiple vertex cover constraintsmore »Bera et al. (Theoret Comput Sci 555:2–8 Bera et al. 2014). Both these algorithms are based on mathematical programming relaxations that avoid the limitations of the greedy algorithm. We demonstrate the implications of our algorithms and related ideas to several applications ranging from geometric covering problems to clustering with outliers. Our work highlights the utility of the high-level model and the lens of submodularity in addressing this class of covering problems.

   « less