Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 5:00 PM ET until 11:00 PM ET on Friday, June 21 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Fast and Simple Solutions of Blotto Games
In the Colonel Blotto game, which was initially introduced by Borel in 1921, two colonels simultaneously distribute their troops across different battlefields. The winner of each battlefield is determined independently by a winner-takes-all rule. The ultimate payoff for each colonel is the number of battlefields won. The Colonel Blotto game is commonly used for analyzing a wide range of applications from the U.S. Presidential election to innovative technology competitions to advertising, sports, and politics. There are persistent efforts to find the optimal strategies for the Colonel Blotto game. However, the first polynomial-time algorithm for that has very recently been provided by Ahmadinejad, Dehghani, Hajiaghayi, Lucier, Mahini, and Seddighin. Their algorithm consists of an exponential size linear program (LP), which they solve using the ellipsoid method. Because of the use of the ellipsoid method, despite its significant theoretical importance, this algorithm is highly impractical. In general, even the simplex method (despite its exponential running time in practice) performs better than the ellipsoid method in practice. In this paper, we provide the first polynomial-size LP formulation of the optimal strategies for the Colonel Blotto game using linear extension techniques. Roughly speaking, we consider the natural representation of the strategy space polytope and transform it to a higher dimensional strategy space, which interestingly has exponentially fewer facets. In other words, we add a few variables to the LP such that, surprisingly, the number of constraints drops down to a polynomial. We use this polynomial-size LP to provide a simpler and significantly faster algorithm for finding optimal strategies of the Colonel Blotto game. We further show this representation is asymptotically tight, which means there exists no other linear representation of the strategy space with fewer constraints. We also extend our approach to multidimensional Colonel Blotto games, in which players may have different sorts of budgets, such as money, time, human resources, etc. By implementing this algorithm, we are able to run tests that were previously impossible to solve in a reasonable time. This information allows us to observe some interesting properties of Colonel Blotto; for example, we find out the behavior of players in the discrete model is very similar to the continuous model Roberson solved.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
NSF-PAR ID:
10325844
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Operations Research
ISSN:
0030-364X
Format(s):
Medium: X
National Science Foundation
##### More Like this
1. In the classical discrete Colonel Blotto game—introducedby Borel in 1921—two colonels simultaneously distributetheir troops across multiple battlefields. The winner of eachbattlefield is determined by a winner-take-all rule, independentlyof other battlefields. In the original formulation, eachcolonel’s goal is to win as many battlefields as possible. TheBlotto game and its extensions have been used in a widerange of applications from political campaign—exemplifiedby the U.S presidential election—to marketing campaign,from (innovative) technology competition to sports competition.Despite persistent efforts, efficient methods for findingthe optimal strategies in Blotto games have been elusivefor almost a century—due to exponential explosion inthe organic solution space—until Ahmadinejad, Dehghani,Hajiaghayi, Lucier, Mahini, and Seddighin developed thefirst polynomial-time algorithm for this fundamental gametheoreticalproblem in 2016. However, that breakthroughpolynomial-time solution has some structural limitation. Itapplies only to the case where troops are homogeneous withrespect to battlegruounds, as in Borel’s original formulation:For each battleground, the only factor that matters to the winner’spayoff is how many troops as opposed to which sets oftroops are opposing one another in that battleground.In this paper, we consider a more general setting of thetwo-player-multi-battleground game, in which multifacetedresources (troops) may have different contributions to differentbattlegrounds. In the case of U.S presidential campaign,for example, one may interpret this as different typesof resources—human, financial, political—that teams can investin each state. We provide a complexity-theoretical evidencethat, in contrast to Borel’s homogeneous setting, findingoptimal strategies in multifaceted Colonel Blotto gamesis intractable. We complement this complexity result witha polynomial-time algorithm that finds approximately optimalstrategies with provable guarantees. We also study a furthergeneralization when two competitors do not have zerosum/constant-sum payoffs. We show that optimal strategiesin these two-player-multi-battleground games are as hard tocompute and approximate as Nash equilibria in general noncooperative games and economic equilibria in exchange markets.
more » « less
2. Although security games have attracted intensive research attention over the past years, few existing works consider how information from local communities would affect the game. In this paper, we introduce a new player -- a strategic informant, who can observe and report upcoming attacks -- to the defender-attacker security game setting. Characterized by a private type, the informant has his utility structure that leads to his strategic behaviors. We model the game as a 3-player extensive-form game and propose a novel solution concept of Strong Stackelberg-perfect Bayesian equilibrium. To compute the optimal defender strategy, we first show that although the informant can have infinitely many types in general, the optimal defense plan can only include a finite (exponential) number of different patrol strategies. We then prove that there exists a defense plan with only a linear number of patrol strategies that achieve the optimal defender's utility, which significantly reduces the computational burden and allows us to solve the game in polynomial time using linear programming. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to show the effect of the strategic informant and demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm.

more » « less
3. Mixed strategies are often evaluated based on the expected payoff that they guarantee. This is not always desirable. In this paper, we consider games for which maximizing the expected payoff deviates from the actual goal of the players. To address this issue, we introduce the notion of a (u,p)-maxmin strategy which ensures receiving a minimum utility of u with probability at least p. We then give approximation algorithms for the problem of finding a (u, p)-maxmin strategy for these games. The first game that we consider is Colonel Blotto, a well-studied game that was introduced in 1921. In the Colonel Blotto game, two colonels divide their troops among a set of battlefields. Each battlefield is won by the colonel that puts more troops in it. The payoff of each colonel is the weighted number of battlefields that she wins. We show that maximizing the expected payoff of a player does not necessarily maximize her winning probability for certain applications of Colonel Blotto. For example, in presidential elections, the players’ goal is to maximize the probability of winning more than half of the votes, rather than maximizing the expected number of votes that they get. We give an exact algorithm for a natural variant of continuous version of this game. More generally, we provide constant and logarithmic approximation algorithms for finding (u, p)-maxmin strategies. We also introduce a security game version of Colonel Blotto which we call auditing game. It is played between two players, a defender and an attacker. The goal of the defender is to prevent the attacker from changing the outcome of an instance of Colonel Blotto. Again, maximizing the expected payoff of the defender is not necessarily optimal. Therefore we give a constant approximation for (u, p)-maxmin strategies.
more » « less
4. We consider partially-specified optimization problems where the goal is to actively, but efficiently, acquire missing information about the problem in order to solve it. An algo- rithm designer wishes to solve a linear pro- gram (LP), maxcT x s.t. Ax ≤ b,x ≥ 0, but does not initially know some of the pa- rameters. The algorithm can iteratively choose an unknown parameter and gather information in the form of a noisy sample centered at the parameter’s (unknown) value. The goal is to find an approximately feasible and optimal so- lution to the underlying LP with high proba- bility while drawing a small number of sam- ples. We focus on two cases. (1) When the parameters b of the constraints are initially un- known, we propose an efficient algorithm com- bining techniques from the ellipsoid method for LP and confidence-bound approaches from bandit algorithms. The algorithm adaptively gathers information about constraints only as needed in order to make progress. We give sample complexity bounds for the algorithm and demonstrate its improvement over a naive approach via simulation. (2) When the param- eters c of the objective are initially unknown, we take an information-theoretic approach and give roughly matching upper and lower sam- ple complexity bounds, with an (inefficient) successive-elimination algorithm.
more » « less
5. We present a progressive approximation algorithm for the exact solution of several classes of interdiction games in which two noncooperative players (namely an attacker and a follower) interact sequentially. The follower must solve an optimization problem that has been previously perturbed by means of a series of attacking actions led by the attacker. These attacking actions aim at augmenting the cost of the decision variables of the follower’s optimization problem. The objective, from the attacker’s viewpoint, is that of choosing an attacking strategy that reduces as much as possible the quality of the optimal solution attainable by the follower. The progressive approximation mechanism consists of the iterative solution of an interdiction problem in which the attacker actions are restricted to a subset of the whole solution space and a pricing subproblem invoked with the objective of proving the optimality of the attacking strategy. This scheme is especially useful when the optimal solutions to the follower’s subproblem intersect with the decision space of the attacker only in a small number of decision variables. In such cases, the progressive approximation method can solve interdiction games otherwise intractable for classical methods. We illustrate the efficiency of our approach on the shortest path, 0-1 knapsack and facility location interdiction games. Summary of Contribution: In this article, we present a progressive approximation algorithm for the exact solution of several classes of interdiction games in which two noncooperative players (namely an attacker and a follower) interact sequentially. We exploit the discrete nature of this interdiction game to design an effective algorithmic framework that improves the performance of general-purpose solvers. Our algorithm combines elements from mathematical programming and computer science, including a metaheuristic algorithm, a binary search procedure, a cutting-planes algorithm, and supervalid inequalities. Although we illustrate our results on three specific problems (shortest path, 0-1 knapsack, and facility location), our algorithmic framework can be extended to a broader class of interdiction problems.
more » « less