More Like this

1. Iceberg Hashing: Optimizing Many Hash-Table Criteria at Once

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3625817  

   Bender, Michael A. ; Conway, Alex ; Farach-Colton, Martín ; Kuszmaul, William ; Tagliavini, Guido ( December 2023 , Journal of the ACM)

   Despite being one of the oldest data structures in computer science, hash tables continue to be the focus of a great deal of both theoretical and empirical research. A central reason for this is that many of the fundamental properties that one desires from a hash table are difficult to achieve simultaneously; thus many variants offering different trade-offs have been proposed.

   This article introduces Iceberg hashing, a hash table that simultaneously offers the strongest known guarantees on a large number of core properties. Iceberg hashing supports constant-time operations while improving on the state of the art for space efficiency, cache efficiency, and low failure probability. Iceberg hashing is also the first hash table to support a load factor of up to1 - o(1)while being stable, meaning that the position where an element is stored only ever changes when resizes occur. In fact, in the setting where keys are Θ (logn) bits, the space guarantees that Iceberg hashing offers, namely that it uses at most\(\log \binom{|U|}{n} + O(n \log \ \text{log} n)\)bits to storenitems from a universeU, matches a lower bound by Demaine et al. that applies to any stable hash table.

   Iceberg hashing introduces new general-purpose techniques for some of the most basic aspects of hash-table design. Notably, our indirection-free technique for dynamic resizing, which we call waterfall addressing, and our techniques for achieving stability and very-high probability guarantees, can be applied to any hash table that makes use of the front-yard/backyard paradigm for hash table design.

    

   more » « less
2. Tiny Pointers

   Michael A. Bender ; Alex Conway ; Martín Farach-Colton ; William Kuszmaul ; Guido Tagliavini ( January 2023 , Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA))

   This paper introduces a new data-structural object that we call the tiny pointer. In many applications, traditional log n-bit pointers can be replaced with o(log n)-bit tiny pointers at the cost of only a constant-factor time overhead and a small probability of failure. We develop a comprehensive theory of tiny pointers, and give optimal constructions for both fixed-size tiny pointers (i.e., settings in which all of the tiny pointers must be the same size) and variable-size tiny pointers (i.e., settings in which the average tiny-pointer size must be small, but some tiny pointers can be larger). If a tiny pointer references an element in an array filled to load factor 1 — δ, then the optimal tiny-pointer size is Θ(log log log n + log δ-1) bits in the fixed-size case, and Θ(log δ-1) expected bits in the variable-size case. Our tiny-pointer constructions also require us to revisit several classic problems having to do with balls and bins; these results may be of independent interest. Using tiny pointers, we revisit five classic data-structure problems. We show that: • A data structure storing n v-bit values for n keys with constant-time modifications/queries can be implemented to take space nv + O(n log(r) n) bits, for any constant r > 0, as long as the user stores a tiny pointer of expected size O(1) with each key—here, log(r) n is the r-th iterated logarithm. • Any binary search tree can be made succinct with constant-factor time overhead, and can even be made to be within O(n) bits of optimal if we allow for O(log* n)-time modifications—this holds even for rotation-based trees such as the splay tree and the red-black tree. • Any fixed-capacity key-value dictionary can be made stable (i.e., items do not move once inserted) with constant-time overhead and 1 + o(1) space overhead. • Any key-value dictionary that requires uniform-size values can be made to support arbitrary-size values with constant-time overhead and with an additional space consumption of log(r) n + O(log j) bits per j-bit value for an arbitrary constant r > 0 of our choice. • Given an external-memory array A of size (1 + ε)n containing a dynamic set of up to n key-value pairs, it is possible to maintain an internal-memory stash of size O(n log ε-1) bits so that the location of any key-value pair in A can be computed in constant time (and with no IOs). These are all well studied and classic problems, and in each case tiny pointers allow for us to take a natural space-inefficient solution that uses pointers and make it space-efficient for free. 

   more » « less
3. Cross-Referenced Dictionaries and the Limits of Write Optimization

   https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974782.99  

   Afshani, Peyman ; Bender, Michael ; Farach-Colton, Martin ; Fineman, Jeremy ; Goswami, Mayank ; Tsai, Meng-Tsung Tsai ( January 2017 , Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms)

   Dictionaries remain the most well studied class of data structures. A dictionary supports insertions, deletions, membership queries, and usually successor, predecessor, and extract-min. In a RAM, all such operations take O(log n) time on n elements. Dictionaries are often cross-referenced as follows. Consider a set of tuples {〈ai,bi,ci…〉}. A database might include more than one dictionary on such a set, for example, one indexed on the a ‘s, another on the b‘s, and so on. Once again, in a RAM, inserting into a set of L cross-referenced dictionaries takes O(L log n) time, as does deleting. The situation is more interesting in external memory. On a Disk Access Machine (DAM), B-trees achieve O(logB N) I/Os for insertions and deletions on a single dictionary and K-element range queries take optimal O(logB N + K/B) I/Os. These bounds are also achievable by a B-tree on cross-referenced dictionaries, with a slowdown of an L factor on insertion and deletions. In recent years, both the theory and practice of external- memory dictionaries has been revolutionized by write- optimization techniques. A dictionary is write optimized if it is close to a B-tree for query time while beating B-trees on insertions. The best (and optimal) dictionaries achieve a substantially improved insertion and deletion cost of amortized I/Os on a single dictionary while maintaining optimal O(log1+B∊ N + K/B)- I/O range queries. Although write optimization still helps for insertions into cross-referenced dictionaries, its value for deletions would seem to be greatly reduced. A deletion into a cross- referenced dictionary only specifies a key a. It seems to be necessary to look up the associated values b, c … in order to delete them from the other dictionaries. This takes Ω(logB N) I/Os, well above the per-dictionary write-optimization budget of So the total deletion cost is In short, for deletions, write optimization offers an advantage over B-trees in that L multiplies a lower order term, but when L = 2, write optimization seems to offer no asymptotic advantage over B-trees. That is, no known query- optimal solution for pairs of cross-referenced dictionaries seem to beat B-trees for deletions. In this paper, we show a lower bound establishing that a pair of cross-referenced dictionaries that are optimal for range queries and that supports deletions cannot match the write optimization bound available to insert-only dictionaries. This result thus establishes a limit to the applicability of write-optimization techniques on which many new databases and file systems are based. Read More: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/1.9781611974782.99 

   more » « less
4. Linear Probing Revisited: Tombstones Mark the Demise of Primary Clustering

   Bender, M. ; Kuszmaul, B. ; Kuszmaul, W. ( January 2021 , Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science)

   First introduced in 1954, the linear-probing hash table is among the oldest data structures in computer science, and thanks to its unrivaled data locality, linear probing continues to be one of the fastest hash tables in practice. It is widely believed and taught, however, that linear probing should never be used at high load factors; this is because of an effect known as primary clustering which causes insertions at a load factor of 1 - 1/x to take expected time O(x2) (rather than the intuitive running time of ⇥(x)). The dangers of primary clustering, first discovered by Knuth in 1963, have now been taught to generations of computer scientists, and have influenced the design of some of the most widely used hash tables in production. We show that primary clustering is not the foregone conclusion that it is reputed to be. We demonstrate that seemingly small design decisions in how deletions are implemented have dramatic effects on the asymptotic performance of insertions: if these design decisions are made correctly, then even if a hash table operates continuously at a load factor of 1 - (1/x), the expected amortized cost per insertion/deletion is O(x). This is because the tombstones left behind by deletions can actually cause an anti-clustering effect that combats primary clustering. Interestingly, these design decisions, despite their remarkable effects, have historically been viewed as simply implementation-level engineering choices. We also present a new variant of linear probing (which we call graveyard hashing) that completely eliminates primary clustering on any sequence of operations: if, when an operation is performed, the current load factor is 1 1/x for some x, then the expected cost of the operation is O(x). Thus we can achieve the data locality of traditional linear probing without any of the disadvantages of primary clustering. One corollary is that, in the external-memory model with a data blocks of size B, graveyard hashing offers the following remarkably strong guarantee: at any load factor 1 1/x satisfying x = o(B), graveyard hashing achieves 1 + o(1) expected block transfers per operation. In contrast, past external-memory hash tables have only been able to offer a 1 + o(1) guarantee when the block size B is at least O(x2). Our results come with actionable lessons for both theoreticians and practitioners, in particular, that well- designed use of tombstones can completely change the asymptotic landscape of how the linear probing behaves (and even in workloads without deletions). 

   more » « less
5. Optimal Hashing in External Memory

   Conway, Alex Farach-Colton ( January 2018 , Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   Hash tables are a ubiquitous class of dictionary data structures. However, standard hash table implementations do not translate well into the external memory model, because they do not incorporate locality for insertions. Iacono and Pătraşu established an update/query tradeoff curve for external-hash tables: a hash table that performs insertions in O(λ/B) amortized IOs requires Ω(logλ N) expected IOs for queries, where N is the number of items that can be stored in the data structure, B is the size of a memory transfer, M is the size of memory, and λ is a tuning parameter. They provide a complicated hashing data structure, which we call the IP hash table, that meets this curve for λ that is Ω(loglogM +logM N). In this paper, we present a simpler external-memory hash table, the Bundle of Arrays Hash Table (BOA), that is optimal for a narrower range of λ. The simplicity of BOAs allows them to be readily modified to achieve the following results: A new external-memory data structure, the Bundle of Trees Hash Table (BOT), that matches the performance of the IP hash table, while retaining some of the simplicity of the BOAs. The Cache-Oblivious Bundle of Trees Hash Table (COBOT), the first cache-oblivious hash table. This data structure matches the optimality of BOTs and IP hash tables over the same range of λ. 

   more » « less