Urban greening is often proposed for urban heat island (UHI) mitigation because vegetation provides shade and increases evapotranspiration. However, vegetation has lower albedo and higher emissivity than the bare soil it often replaces, which increases incoming energy fluxes. Here, we use the Weather Research and Forecasting model to quantify and compare the albedo and non‐albedo effects (i.e., changes in emissivity, surface roughness, and evaporative fluxes) of urban greening in the Los Angeles Basin under policy relevant urban greening scenarios. When albedo‐induced effects were included in the model, daytime surface temperatures in urban areas warmed by 0.70 ± 0.89°C with increases in the sensible heat flux outweighing increases in the latent heat flux from increased evapotranspiration. In contrast, daytime surface temperatures cooled by 0.27 ± 0.72°C when the albedo‐induced effects were ignored. At night, including albedo‐induced effects of urban greening resulted in only half the cooling modeled in the non‐albedo simulations. Near surface air temperatures also had contrasting model results, with nighttime cooling of 0.21 ± 0.47°C outweighing slight daytime warming of 0.04 ± 0.32°C in the non‐albedo simulations and daytime warming of 0.33 ± 0.41°C outweighing slight nighttime cooling of 0.05 ± 0.46°C in the albedo simulations. Our results reveal the critical role that albedo plays in determining the net surface climate effects of urban greening. Reductions in albedo from urban greening should be carefully considered by policy makers and urban planners, especially as high albedo roofs and pavements are simultaneously being deployed for UHI mitigation in many cities.
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10329690
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Volume:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 2296-701X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Here we use remotely sensed land surface temperature measurements to explore the distribution of the United States’ urban heating burden, both at high resolution (within cities or counties) and at scale (across the whole contiguous United States). While a rich literature has documented neighborhood‐level disparities in urban heat exposures in individual cities, data constraints have precluded comparisons across locations. Here, drawing on urban temperature anomalies during extreme summer surface temperature events from all 1,056 US counties with more than 10 developed census tracts, we find that the poorest tracts (and those with lowest average education levels) within a county are significantly hotter than the richest (and more educated) neighborhoods for 76% of these counties (54% for education); we also find that neighborhoods with higher Black, Hispanic, and Asian population shares are hotter than the more White, non‐Hispanic areas in each county. This holds in counties with both large and small spreads in these population shares, and for 71% of all counties the significant racial urban heat disparities persist even when adjusting for income. Although individual locations have different histories that have contributed to race‐ and class‐based geographies, we find that the physical features of the urban environments driving these surface heat exposure gradients are fairly uniform across the country. Systematically, the disproportionate heat surface exposures faced by minority communities are due to more built‐up neighborhoods, less vegetation, and—to a lesser extent—higher population density.
-
more » « less
Abstract We compare high‐resolution land‐surface temperature (LST) estimates from the GOES‐16/17 (GOES) satellites to ERA‐5 Land (ERA‐5) reanalysis data across nine large US cities. We quantify the offset and find that ERA‐5 generally overestimates LST compared to GOES by 1.63°C. However, this overestimation is less pronounced in urban areas, underscoring the limitations of ERA‐5 in capturing the LST gradient between urban and non‐urban areas. We then examine three quantities: Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII), extreme LST events, and LST exposure by population. We find that ERA‐5 does not accurately represent the diurnal variation and magnitude of SUHII in GOES. Furthermore, while ERA‐5 was on average too warm, ERA‐5 underestimates extreme heat by an average of 2.40°C. Our analysis reveals higher population exposure to high LST in the GOES data set across the cities studied. This discrepancy is especially pronounced when estimating the population fraction that are most exposed to heat.
-
more » « less
Abstract This study evaluates the impact of land surface models (LSMs) and urban heterogeneity [using local climate zones (LCZs)] on air temperature simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) during a regional extreme event. We simulated the 2017 heatwave over Europe considering four scenarios, using WRF coupled with two LSMs (i.e., Noah and Noah‐MP) with default land use/land cover (LULC) and with LCZs from the World Urban Database and Access Portal Tools (WUDAPT). The results showed that implementing the LCZs significantly improves the WRF simulations of the daily temperature regardless of the LSMs. Implementing the LCZs altered the surface energy balance partitioning in the simulations (i.e., the sensible heat flux was reduced and latent heat flux was increased) primarily due to a higher vegetation feedback in the LCZs. The changes in the surface flux translated into an increase in the simulated 2‐m relative humidity and 10‐m wind speed as well as changed air temperature within cities section and generated a temperature gradient that affected the temperatures beyond the urban regions. Despite these changes, the factor separation analysis indicated that the impact of LSM selection was more significant than the inclusion of LCZs. Interestingly, the lowest bias in temperature simulations was achieved when WRF was coupled with the Noah as the LSM and used WUDAPT as the LULC/urban representation.
-
more » « less
Abstract High nighttime urban air temperatures increase health risks and economic vulnerability of people globally. While recent studies have highlighted nighttime heat mitigation effects of urban vegetation, the magnitude and variability of vegetation-derived urban nighttime cooling differs greatly among cities. We hypothesize that urban vegetation-derived nighttime air cooling is driven by vegetation density whose effect is regulated by aridity through increasing transpiration. We test this hypothesis by deploying microclimate sensors across eight United States cities and investigating relationships of nighttime air temperature and urban vegetation throughout a summer season. Urban vegetation decreased nighttime air temperature in all cities. Vegetation cooling magnitudes increased as a function of aridity, resulting in the lowest cooling magnitude of 1.4 °C in the most humid city, Miami, FL, and 5.6 °C in the most arid city, Las Vegas, NV. Consistent with the differences among cities, the cooling effect increased during heat waves in all cities. For cities that experience a summer monsoon, Phoenix and Tucson, AZ, the cooling magnitude was larger during the more arid pre-monsoon season than during the more humid monsoon period. Our results place the large differences among previous measurements of vegetation nighttime urban cooling into a coherent physiological framework dependent on plant transpiration. This work informs urban heat risk planning by providing a framework for using urban vegetation as an environmental justice tool and can help identify where and when urban vegetation has the largest effect on mitigating nighttime temperatures.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.695995
