More Like this

1. ASTRAL-Pro: Quartet-Based Species-Tree Inference despite Paralogy

   https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa139  

   Zhang, Chao; Scornavacca, Celine; Molloy, Erin K; Mirarab, Siavash (September 2020, Molecular Biology and Evolution)

   Thorne, Jeffrey (Ed.)

   Abstract Phylogenetic inference from genome-wide data (phylogenomics) has revolutionized the study of evolution because it enables accounting for discordance among evolutionary histories across the genome. To this end, summary methods have been developed to allow accurate and scalable inference of species trees from gene trees. However, most of these methods, including the widely used ASTRAL, can only handle single-copy gene trees and do not attempt to model gene duplication and gene loss. As a result, most phylogenomic studies have focused on single-copy genes and have discarded large parts of the data. Here, we first propose a measure of quartet similarity between single-copy and multicopy trees that accounts for orthology and paralogy. We then introduce a method called ASTRAL-Pro (ASTRAL for PaRalogs and Orthologs) to find the species tree that optimizes our quartet similarity measure using dynamic programing. By studying its performance on an extensive collection of simulated data sets and on real data sets, we show that ASTRAL-Pro is more accurate than alternative methods. 

   more » « less
2. Shared single copy genes are generally reliable for inferring phylogenetic relationships among polyploid taxa

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108087  

   Naranjo, Jaells G; Sither, Charles B; Conant, Gavin C (July 2024, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution)

   Polyploidy, or whole-genome duplication, is expected to confound the inference of species trees with phyloge- netic methods for two reasons. First, the presence of retained duplicated genes requires the reconciliation of the inferred gene trees to a proposed species tree. Second, even if the analyses are restricted to shared single copy genes, the occurrence of reciprocal gene loss, where the surviving genes in different species are paralogs from the polyploidy rather than orthologs, will mean that such genes will not have evolved under the corresponding species tree and may not produce gene trees that allow inference of that species tree. Here we analyze three different ancient polyploidy events, using synteny-based inferences of orthology and paralogy to infer gene trees from nearly 17,000 sets of homologous genes. We find that the simple use of single copy genes from polyploid organisms provides reasonably robust phylogenetic signals, despite the presence of reciprocal gene losses. Such gene trees are also most often in accord with the inferred species relationships inferred from maximum likelihood models of gene loss after polyploidy: a completely distinct phylogenetic signal present in these genomes. As seen in other studies, however, we find that methods for inferring phylogenetic confidence yield high support values even in cases where the underlying data suggest meaningful conflict in the phylogenetic signals. 

   more » « less
3. Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs

   https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab056  

   Yan, Zhi; Smith, Megan L; Du, Peng; Hahn, Matthew W; Nakhleh, Luay (July 2021, Systematic Biology)

   Kubatko, Laura (Ed.)

   Abstract Many recent phylogenetic methods have focused on accurately inferring species trees when there is gene tree discordance due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). For almost all of these methods, and for phylogenetic methods in general, the data for each locus are assumed to consist of orthologous, single-copy sequences. Loci that are present in more than a single copy in any of the studied genomes are excluded from the data. These steps greatly reduce the number of loci available for analysis. The question we seek to answer in this study is: what happens if one runs such species tree inference methods on data where paralogy is present, in addition to or without ILS being present? Through simulation studies and analyses of two large biological data sets, we show that running such methods on data with paralogs can still provide accurate results. We use multiple different methods, some of which are based directly on the multispecies coalescent model, and some of which have been proven to be statistically consistent under it. We also treat the paralogous loci in multiple ways: from explicitly denoting them as paralogs, to randomly selecting one copy per species. In all cases, the inferred species trees are as accurate as equivalent analyses using single-copy orthologs. Our results have significant implications for the use of ILS-aware phylogenomic analyses, demonstrating that they do not have to be restricted to single-copy loci. This will greatly increase the amount of data that can be used for phylogenetic inference.[Gene duplication and loss; incomplete lineage sorting; multispecies coalescent; orthology; paralogy.] 

   more » « less
4. The Frequency and Topology of Pseudoorthologs

   https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab097  

   Smith, Megan L.; Hahn, Matthew W.; Smith, ed., Stephen (December 2021, Systematic Biology)

   Abstract Phylogenetics has long relied on the use of orthologs, or genes related through speciation events, to infer species relationships. However, identifying orthologs is difficult because gene duplication can obscure relationships among genes. Researchers have been particularly concerned with the insidious effects of pseudoorthologs—duplicated genes that are mistaken for orthologs because they are present in a single copy in each sampled species. Because gene tree topologies of pseudoorthologs may differ from the species tree topology, they have often been invoked as the cause of counterintuitive results in phylogenetics. Despite these perceived problems, no previous work has calculated the probabilities of pseudoortholog topologies or has been able to circumscribe the regions of parameter space in which pseudoorthologs are most likely to occur. Here, we introduce a model for calculating the probabilities and branch lengths of orthologs and pseudoorthologs, including concordant and discordant pseudoortholog topologies, on a rooted three-taxon species tree. We show that the probability of orthologs is high relative to the probability of pseudoorthologs across reasonable regions of parameter space. Furthermore, the probabilities of the two discordant topologies are equal and never exceed that of the concordant topology, generally being much lower. We describe the species tree topologies most prone to generating pseudoorthologs, finding that they are likely to present problems to phylogenetic inference irrespective of the presence of pseudoorthologs. Overall, our results suggest that pseudoorthologs are unlikely to mislead inferences of species relationships under the biological scenarios considered here.[Birth–death model; orthologs; paralogs; phylogenetics.] 

   more » « less
5. Developing Asparagaceae1726: An Asparagaceae‐specific probe set targeting 1726 loci for Hyb‐Seq and phylogenomics in the family

   https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11597  

   Bentz, Philip C; Leebens‐Mack, Jim (September 2024, Applications in Plant Sciences)

   Abstract PremiseTarget sequence capture (Hyb‐Seq) is a cost‐effective sequencing strategy that employs RNA probes to enrich for specific genomic sequences. By targeting conserved low‐copy orthologs, Hyb‐Seq enables efficient phylogenomic investigations. Here, we present Asparagaceae1726—a Hyb‐Seq probe set targeting 1726 low‐copy nuclear genes for phylogenomics in the angiosperm family Asparagaceae—which will aid the often‐challenging delineation and resolution of evolutionary relationships within Asparagaceae. MethodsHere we describe and validate the Asparagaceae1726 probe set (https://github.com/bentzpc/Asparagaceae1726) in six of the seven subfamilies of Asparagaceae. We perform phylogenomic analyses with these 1726 loci and evaluate how inclusion of paralogs and bycatch plastome sequences can enhance phylogenomic inference with target‐enriched data sets. ResultsWe recovered at least 82% of target orthologs from all sampled taxa, and phylogenomic analyses resulted in strong support for all subfamilial relationships. Additionally, topology and branch support were congruent between analyses with and without inclusion of target paralogs, suggesting that paralogs had limited effect on phylogenomic inference. DiscussionAsparagaceae1726 is effective across the family and enables the generation of robust data sets for phylogenomics of any Asparagaceae taxon. Asparagaceae1726 establishes a standardized set of loci for phylogenomic analysis in Asparagaceae, which we hope will be widely used for extensible and reproducible investigations of diversification in the family. 

   more » « less