skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Improving model-satellite comparisons of sea ice melt onset with a satellite simulator
Abstract. Seasonal transitions in Arctic sea ice, such as the melt onset, have been found to be useful metrics for evaluating sea ice in climate models against observations. However, comparisons of melt onset dates between climate models and satellite observations are indirect. Satellite data products of melt onset rely on observed brightness temperatures, while climate models do not currently simulate brightness temperatures, and must therefore define melt onset with other modeled variables. Here we adapt a passive microwave sea ice satellite simulator, the Arctic Ocean Observation Operator (ARC3O), to produce simulated brightness temperatures that can be used to diagnose the timing of the earliest snowmelt in climate models, as we show here using Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) ocean-ice hindcasts. By producing simulated brightness temperatures and earliest snowmelt estimation dates using CESM2 and ARC3O, we facilitate new and previously impossible comparisons between the model and satellite observations by removing the uncertainty that arises due to definition differences. Direct comparisons between the model and satellite data allow us to identify an early bias across large areas of the Arctic at the beginning of the CESM2 ocean-ice hindcast melt season, as well as improve our understanding of the physical processes underlying seasonal changes in brightness temperatures. In particular, the ARC3O allows us to show that satellite algorithm-based melt onset dates likely occur after significant snowmelt has already taken place.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1847398
PAR ID:
10357455
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
The Cryosphere
Volume:
16
Issue:
8
ISSN:
1994-0424
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3235 to 3248
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Zenodo)
    Earliest snowmelt estimation dates calculated for the year 2003 are provided using sea ice brightness temperatures from AMSR-E (Cavalieri et al., 2014) and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS (Meier et al., 2019), as well as simulated sea ice brightness temperatures from the CESM2 JRA-55 (Danabasoglu et al., 2020; Kobayashi et al., 2015; Tsujino et al., 2018), which were created using the Arctic Ocean Observation Operator (ARC3O; Burgard et al, 2020a,b). Scripts and README files are provided for preparing the model data to act as input to ARC3O. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, The Cryosphere)
    Abstract. Arctic sea ice experiences a dramatic annual cycle, and seasonal ice loss and growth can be characterized by various metrics: melt onset, breakup, opening, freeze onset, freeze-up, and closing. By evaluating a range of seasonal sea ice metrics, CMIP6 sea ice simulations can be evaluated in more detail than by using traditional metrics alone, such as sea ice area. We show that models capture the observed asymmetry in seasonal sea ice transitions, with spring ice loss taking about 1–2 months longer than fall ice growth. The largest impacts of internal variability are seen in the inflow regions for melt and freeze onset dates, but all metrics show pan-Arctic model spreads exceeding the internal variability range, indicating the contribution of model differences. Through climate model evaluation in the context of both observations and internal variability, we show that biases in seasonal transition dates can compensate for other unrealistic aspects of simulated sea ice. In some models, this leads to September sea ice areas in agreement with observations for the wrong reasons. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene)
    Melt ponds on sea ice play an important role in the Arctic climate system. Their presence alters the partitioning of solar radiation: decreasing reflection, increasing absorption and transmission to the ice and ocean, and enhancing melt. The spatiotemporal properties of melt ponds thus modify ice albedo feedbacks and the mass balance of Arctic sea ice. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition presented a valuable opportunity to investigate the seasonal evolution of melt ponds through a rich array of atmosphere-ice-ocean measurements across spatial and temporal scales. In this study, we characterize the seasonal behavior and variability in the snow, surface scattering layer, and melt ponds from spring melt to autumn freeze-up using in situ surveys and auxiliary observations. We compare the results to satellite retrievals and output from two models: the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and the Marginal Ice Zone Modeling and Assimilation System (MIZMAS). During the melt season, the maximum pond coverage and depth were 21% and 22 ± 13 cm, respectively, with distribution and depth corresponding to surface roughness and ice thickness. Compared to observations, both models overestimate melt pond coverage in summer, with maximum values of approximately 41% (MIZMAS) and 51% (CESM2). This overestimation has important implications for accurately simulating albedo feedbacks. During the observed freeze-up, weather events, including rain on snow, caused high-frequency variability in snow depth, while pond coverage and depth remained relatively constant until continuous freezing ensued. Both models accurately simulate the abrupt cessation of melt ponds during freeze-up, but the dates of freeze-up differ. MIZMAS accurately simulates the observed date of freeze-up, while CESM2 simulates freeze-up one-to-two weeks earlier. This work demonstrates areas that warrant future observation-model synthesis for improving the representation of sea-ice processes and properties, which can aid accurate simulations of albedo feedbacks in a warming climate. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, NSF Arctic Data Center)
    This dataset includes annual, gridded Arctic sea ice seasonal transition metrics (dates and periods) for fifteen Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 6 (CMIP6) models and the Community Earth System Model version 1.1 (CESM1.1) Large Ensemble (CESM LE) (Kay, et al., 2015). Seasonal transition dates include melt onset, opening, break-up, freeze onset, freeze-up and closing. Seasonal transition periods include the melt period, the seasonal loss-of-ice period, the freeze period, the seasonal gain-of-ice period, the melt season, the open water period and the outer ice-free period. Data are provided for one ensemble member of the following models: Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator CM2 (ACCESS-CM2), Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model 2 MR (BCC-CSM2-MR), Beijing Climate Center Earth System Model 1 (BCC-ESM1), Community Earth System Model 2 (CESM2), Community Earth System Model 2 FV2 (CESM2-FV2), Community Earth System Model 2 Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (CESM2-WACCM), Community Earth System Model 2 Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model FV2 (CESM2-WACCM-FV2), Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques ESM 2-1 (CNRM-ESM2-1), Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques CM 6-1 (CNRM-CM6-1), EC-Earth3, Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model 2-0 (MRI-ESM2-0), Norwegian Earth System Model 2 LM (NorESM2-LM) and Norwegian Earth System Model 2 MM (NorESM2-MM). Data are provided for 40 members of the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble (CESM LE), 35 members of Canadian Earth System Model 5 (CanESM5) and 30 members of Institut Pierre Simon Laplace CM6A LR (IPSL-CM6A-LR). The data is stored in netcdf format, and includes metadata in the netcdf files. The raw CMIP6 and CESM LE model output that these transition metrics are calculated from are publicly available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/ and https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/ respectively. This dataset was created to evaluate climate model projections of Arctic sea ice using seasonal transition metrics in the context of both observations and internal variability. It is used in the article Smith, Jahn, Wang (2020), Seasonal transition dates can reveal biases in Arctic sea ice simulations, The Cryosphere, in press. The discussion paper with a link to the final paper can be found at https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-81. This work was conducted at the University of Colorado Boulder from 2019-2020. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, The Cryosphere)
    Abstract. The annual sea ice freeze–thaw cycle plays a crucial role in theArctic atmosphere—ice–ocean system, regulating the seasonal energy balanceof sea ice and the underlying upper-ocean. Previous studies of the sea icefreeze–thaw cycle were often based on limited accessible in situ or easilyavailable remotely sensed observations of the surface. To better understandthe responses of the sea ice to climate change and its coupling to the upperocean, we combine measurements of the ice surface and bottom usingmultisource data to investigate the temporal and spatial variations in thefreeze–thaw cycle of Arctic sea ice. Observations by 69 sea ice mass balancebuoys (IMBs) collected from 2001 to 2018 revealed that the average ice basalmelt onset in the Beaufort Gyre occurred on 23 May (±6 d),approximately 17 d earlier than the surface melt onset. The average icebasal melt onset in the central Arctic Ocean occurred on 17 June (±9 d), which was comparable with the surface melt onset. This difference wasmainly attributed to the distinct seasonal variations of oceanic heatavailable to sea ice melt between the two regions. The overall average onsetof basal ice growth of the pan Arctic Ocean occurred on 14 November (±21 d), lagging approximately 3 months behind the surface freezeonset. This temporal delay was caused by a combination of cooling the seaice, the ocean mixed layer, and the ocean subsurface layer, as well as thethermal buffering of snow atop the ice. In the Beaufort Gyre region, both(Lagrangian) IMB observations (2001–2018) and (Eulerian) moored upward-looking sonar (ULS) observations (2003–2018) revealed a trend towardsearlier basal melt onset, mainly linked to the earlier warming of thesurface ocean. A trend towards earlier onset of basal ice growth was alsoidentified from the IMB observations (multiyear ice), which we attributed tothe overall reduction of ice thickness. In contrast, a trend towards delayedonset of basal ice growth was identified from the ULS observations, whichwas explained by the fact that the ice cover melted almost entirely by theend of summer in recent years. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email