skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Measuring the Efficiency of Alternative Biodiversity Monitoring Sampling Strategies
Monitoring is a crucial tool for measuring the progress and success of environmental policies and management programs. While many studies have evaluated the effectiveness of biodiversity sampling methods, few have compared their efficiency, which is crucial given the funding constraints present in all conservation efforts. In this study we demonstrate how existing analytical tools can be applied to (i) assess the relationship between sampling effort and resulting confidence in biodiversity metrics, and (ii) compare the efficiency of different methods for monitoring biodiversity. We tested this methodology on data from marine fish surveys, including: roving surveys within permanent areas, randomly placed belt transects, and randomly placed transects conducted by citizen scientists using a reduced species list. We constructed efficiency curves describing how increasing effort spent on each method reduced uncertainty in biodiversity estimates and the associated ability to detect change in diversity. All programs produced comparable measurements of species diversity for all metrics despite substantial differences in the species being surveyed by each method. The uncertainty of diversity estimations fell faster and reached a lower level for the roving diver method. Strikingly, the transect method conducted by citizen scientists performed almost identically to the more taxonomically resolved transect method conducted by professional scientists, suggesting that sampling strategies that recorded only a subset of species could still be effective, as long as the excluded species were chosen strategically. The methodology described here can guide decisions about how to measure biodiversity and optimize the resources available for monitoring, ultimately improving management outcomes.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1831937
PAR ID:
10378018
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Marine Science
Volume:
9
ISSN:
2296-7745
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Weasels (genusMustelaandNeogale) are of management concern as declining native species in some regions and invasive species in others. Regardless of the need to conserve or remove weasels, there is increasingly a need to use non‐invasive monitoring methods to assess population trends.We conducted a literature review and held the first ever International Weasel Monitoring Symposium to synthesise information on historical and current non‐invasive monitoring techniques for weasels. We also explored current limitations, opportunities, and areas of development to guide future research and long‐term monitoring.Our literature search revealed that in the past 20 years, camera traps were the most commonly used non‐invasive monitoring method (62% of studies), followed by track plates or scent stations designed to collect footprints (23%) and walking transects for tracks in snow or soil (8.7%).Experts agreed that the most promising non‐invasive monitoring techniques available include use of citizen scientist reporting, detection dogs, detecting tracks, non‐invasive genetic surveys, and enclosed or unenclosed camera trap systems. Because each technique has benefits and limitations, using a multi‐method approach is likely required.There is a need for strong commitment to dedicated monitoring that is replicated over space and time such that trend data can be ascertained to better inform future management action. The diversity of non‐invasive monitoring methods now available makes such monitoring possible with relatively minor commitments of funding and effort. 
    more » « less
  2. Transect-based monitoring has long been a valuable tool in ecosystem monitoring. These transects are often used to measure multiple ecosystem attributes. The line-point intercept (LPI), vegetation height, and canopy gap intercept methods comprise a set of core methods, which provide indicators of ecosystem condition. However, users struggle to design a sampling strategy that optimizes the ability to detect ecological change using transect-based methods. We assessed the sensitivity of these core methods on a one-hectare plot to transect length, number, and sampling interval to determine: 1) minimum sampling required to describe ecosystem characteristics and detect change for each method and 2) optimal transect length and number for all three methods to make recommendations for future analyses and monitoring efforts. We used data from 13 National Wind Erosion Research Network locations spanning the western US, which included 151 measurements over time across five biomes. We found that longer and increased numbers of transects were more important for reducing sampling error than increased sample intensity along transects. For all methods and indicators across plots, three 100-m transects reduced sampling error so that indicator estimates fall within an 95% confidence interval of +/- 5% for canopy gap intercept and LPI-total foliar cover, +/- 5 cm for height and +/- two species for LPI-species counts. For the same criteria at 80% confidence intervals, two 100-m transects are needed. Site-scale inference was strongly affected by sample design, consequently our understanding of ecological dynamics may be influenced by sampling decisions. 
    more » « less
  3. The Southern Ocean’s continental shelf communities harbor high benthic biodiversity. However, most census methods have relied on trawling or dredging rather than direct observation. Benthic photographic and videographic transect surveys serve a key role in characterizing marine communities’ abundance and diversity, and they also provide information on the spatial arrangement of species within a community. To investigate diversity and abundance in Southern Ocean benthic communities, we employed photographic transects during cruises aboard the RVIB Nathanial B. Palmer (November 2012) and the ASRV Laurence M. Gould (February 2013). One kilometer long photographic transects were conducted at 8 sites along 6,000 km of Western Antarctica from the tip of the Antarctic Peninsula to the Ross Sea from which epifaunal echinoderms, tunicates, arthropods, cnidarians, poriferans, and annelids were identified and counted allowing estimations of biodiversity. Our results do not support a latitudinal trend in diversity, but rather a decrease in abundance of macrofaunal individuals at higher latitude sites. All communities sampled on the Western Antarctic shelf were primarily dominated by ophiuroids, pycnogonids, holothuroids, and demosponges. However, the most abundant taxon across all sites was Ophionotus victoriae , followed by the symbiotic partners Iophon sp. (demosponge) and Ophioplinthus spp. (ophiuroid). Data also confirm that the Southern Ocean is composed of discretely unique benthic communities. These results provide critical understanding of the current community structure and diversity serving as a baseline as the Antarctic continental shelf changes due to rising ocean temperatures, climate change, and collapse of large ice sheets. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Long-term terrestrial ecosystem monitoring is a critical component of documenting outcomes of land management actions, assessing progress towards management objectives, and guiding realistic long-term ecological goals, all through repeated observation and measurement. Traditional monitoring methods have evolved for specific applications in forestry, ecology, and fire and fuels management. While successful monitoring programs have clear goals, trained expertise, and rigorous sampling protocols, new advances in technology and data management can help overcome the most common pitfalls in data quality and repeatability. This paper presents Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), a specific form of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), as an emerging sampling method that can complement and enhance existing monitoring methods. TLS captures in high resolution the 3D structure of a terrestrial ecosystem (forest, grassland, etc.), and is increasingly efficient and affordable (<$30,000). Integrating TLS into ecosystem monitoring can standardize data collection, improve efficiency, and reduce bias and error. Streamlined data processing pipelines can rigorously analyze TLS data and incorporate constant improvements to inform management decisions and planning. The approach described in this paper utilizes portable, push-button TLS equipment that, when calibrated with initial transect sampling, captures detailed forestry, fuels, and ecological features in less than 5 minutes per plot. We also introduce an interagency automated processing pipeline and dashboard viewer for instant, user-friendly analysis, and data retrieval of hundreds of metrics. Forest metrics and inventories produced with these methods offer effective decision-support data for managers to quantify landscape-scale conditions and respond with efficient action. This protocol further supports interagency compatibility for efficient natural resource monitoring across jurisdictional boundaries with uniform data, language, methods, and data analysis. With continued improvement of scanner capabilities and affordability, these data will shape the future of terrestrial ecosystem monitoring as an important means to address the increasingly fast pace of ecological change facing natural resource managers. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods—malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys—and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change. 
    more » « less