skip to main content


Title: Bounded Rational Game-theoretical Modeling of Human Joint Actions with Incomplete Information
As humans and robots start to collaborate in close proximity, robots are tasked to perceive, comprehend, and anticipate human partners' actions, which demands a predictive model to describe how humans collaborate with each other in joint actions. Previous studies either simplify the collaborative task as an optimal control problem between two agents or do not consider the learning process of humans during repeated interaction. This idyllic representation is thus not able to model human rationality and the learning process. In this paper, a bounded-rational and game-theoretical human cooperative model is developed to describe the cooperative behaviors of the human dyad. An experiment of a joint object pushing collaborative task was conducted with 30 human subjects using haptic interfaces in a virtual environment. The proposed model uses inverse optimal control (IOC) to model the reward parameters in the collaborative task. The collected data verified the accuracy of the predicted human trajectory generated from the bounded rational model excels the one with a fully rational model. We further provide insight from the conducted experiments about the effects of leadership on the performance of human collaboration.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1828010 1944833
NSF-PAR ID:
10432756
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
10720 to 10725
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Background

    Human-human (HH) interaction mediated by machines (e.g., robots or passive sensorized devices), which we call human-machine-human (HMH) interaction, has been studied with increasing interest in the last decade. The use of machines allows the implementation of different forms of audiovisual and/or physical interaction in dyadic tasks. HMH interaction between two partners can improve the dyad’s ability to accomplish a joint motor task (task performance) beyond either partner’s ability to perform the task solo. It can also be used to more efficiently train an individual to improve their solo task performance (individual motor learning). We review recent research on the impact of HMH interaction on task performance and individual motor learning in the context of motor control and rehabilitation, and we propose future research directions in this area.

    Methods

    A systematic search was performed on the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases. The search query was designed to find studies that involve HMH interaction in motor control and rehabilitation settings. Studies that do not investigate the effect of changing the interaction conditions were filtered out. Thirty-one studies met our inclusion criteria and were used in the qualitative synthesis.

    Results

    Studies are analyzed based on their results related to the effects of interaction type (e.g., audiovisual communication and/or physical interaction), interaction mode (collaborative, cooperative, co-active, and competitive), and partner characteristics. Visuo-physical interaction generally results in better dyadic task performance than visual interaction alone. In cases where the physical interaction between humans is described by a spring, there are conflicting results as to the effect of the stiffness of the spring. In terms of partner characteristics, having a more skilled partner improves dyadic task performance more than having a less skilled partner. However, conflicting results were observed in terms of individual motor learning.

    Conclusions

    Although it is difficult to draw clear conclusions as to which interaction type, mode, or partner characteristic may lead to optimal task performance or individual motor learning, these results show the possibility for improved outcomes through HMH interaction. Future work that focuses on selecting the optimal personalized interaction conditions and exploring their impact on rehabilitation settings may facilitate the transition of HMH training protocols to clinical implementations.

     
    more » « less
  2. A prerequisite for social coordination is bidirectional communication between teammates, each playing two roles simultaneously: as receptive listeners and expressive speakers. For robots working with humans in complex situations with multiple goals that differ in importance, failure to fulfill the expectation of either role could undermine group performance due to misalignment of values between humans and robots. Specifically, a robot needs to serve as an effective listener to infer human users’ intents from instructions and feedback and as an expressive speaker to explain its decision processes to users. Here, we investigate how to foster effective bidirectional human-robot communications in the context of value alignment—collaborative robots and users form an aligned understanding of the importance of possible task goals. We propose an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) system in which a group of robots predicts users’ values by taking in situ feedback into consideration while communicating their decision processes to users through explanations. To learn from human feedback, our XAI system integrates a cooperative communication model for inferring human values associated with multiple desirable goals. To be interpretable to humans, the system simulates human mental dynamics and predicts optimal explanations using graphical models. We conducted psychological experiments to examine the core components of the proposed computational framework. Our results show that real-time human-robot mutual understanding in complex cooperative tasks is achievable with a learning model based on bidirectional communication. We believe that this interaction framework can shed light on bidirectional value alignment in communicative XAI systems and, more broadly, in future human-machine teaming systems. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Shared control of mobile robots integrates manual input with auxiliary autonomous controllers to improve the overall system performance. However, prior work that seeks to find the optimal shared control ratio needs an accurate human model, which is usually challenging to obtain. In this study, the authors develop an extended Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) (TD3X)‐based shared control framework that learns to assist a human operator in teleoperating mobile robots optimally. The robot's states, shared control ratio in the previous time step, and human's control input is used as inputs to the reinforcement learning (RL) agent, which then outputs the optimal shared control ratio between human input and autonomous controllers without knowing the human model. Noisy softmax policies are developed to make the TD3X algorithm feasible under the constraint of a shared control ratio. Furthermore, to accelerate the training process and protect the robot, a navigation demonstration policy and a safety guard are developed. A neural network (NN) structure is developed to maintain the correlation of sensor readings among heterogeneous input data and improve the learning speed. In addition, an extended DAGGER (DAGGERX) human agent is developed for training the RL agent to reduce human workload. Robot simulations and experiments with humans in the loop are conducted. The results show that the DAGGERX human agent can simulate real human inputs in the worst‐case scenarios with a mean square error of 0.0039. Compared to the original TD3 agent, the TD3X‐based shared control system decreased the average collision number from 387.3 to 44.4 in a simplistic environment and 394.2 to 171.2 in a more complex environment. The maximum average return increased from 1043 to 1187 with a faster converge speed in the simplistic environment, while the performance is equally good in the complex environment because of the use of an advanced human agent. In the human subject tests, participants' average perceived workload was significantly lower in shared control than that in exclusively manual control (26.90 vs. 40.07,p = 0.013).

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    We present BrainNet which, to our knowledge, is the first multi-person non-invasive direct brain-to-brain interface for collaborative problem solving. The interface combines electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain signals and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to deliver information noninvasively to the brain. The interface allows three human subjects to collaborate and solve a task using direct brain-to-brain communication. Two of the three subjects are designated as “Senders” whose brain signals are decoded using real-time EEG data analysis. The decoding process extracts each Sender’s decision about whether to rotate a block in a Tetris-like game before it is dropped to fill a line. The Senders’ decisions are transmitted via the Internet to the brain of a third subject, the “Receiver,” who cannot see the game screen. The Senders’ decisions are delivered to the Receiver’s brain via magnetic stimulation of the occipital cortex. The Receiver integrates the information received from the two Senders and uses an EEG interface to make a decision about either turning the block or keeping it in the same orientation. A second round of the game provides an additional chance for the Senders to evaluate the Receiver’s decision and send feedback to the Receiver’s brain, and for the Receiver to rectify a possible incorrect decision made in the first round. We evaluated the performance of BrainNet in terms of (1) Group-level performance during the game, (2) True/False positive rates of subjects’ decisions, and (3) Mutual information between subjects. Five groups, each with three human subjects, successfully used BrainNet to perform the collaborative task, with an average accuracy of 81.25%. Furthermore, by varying the information reliability of the Senders by artificially injecting noise into one Sender’s signal, we investigated how the Receiver learns to integrate noisy signals in order to make a correct decision. We found that like conventional social networks, BrainNet allows Receivers to learn to trust the Sender who is more reliable, in this case, based solely on the information transmitted directly to their brains. Our results point the way to future brain-to-brain interfaces that enable cooperative problem solving by humans using a “social network” of connected brains.

     
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    Robots have begun operating and collaborating with humans in industrial and social settings. This collaboration introduces challenges: the robot must plan while taking the human’s actions into account. In prior work, the problem was posed as a 2-player deterministic game, with a limited number of human moves. The limit on human moves is unintuitive, and in many settings determinism is undesirable. In this paper, we present a novel planning method for collaborative human-robot manipulation tasks via probabilistic synthesis. We introduce a probabilistic manipulation domain that captures the interaction by allowing for both robot and human actions with states that represent the configurations of the objects in the workspace. The task is specified using Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf ). We then transform our manipulation domain into a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and synthesize an optimal policy to satisfy the specification on this MDP. We present two novel contributions: a formalization of probabilistic manipulation domains allowing us to apply existing techniques and a comparison of different encodings of these domains. Our framework is validated on a physical UR5 robot. 
    more » « less