An official website of the United States government
Abstract The 1-s-resolution U.S. radiosonde data are analyzed for unstable layers, where the potential temperature decreases with increasing altitude, in the troposphere and lower stratosphere (LS). Care is taken to exclude spurious unstable layers arising from noise in the soundings and also to allow for the destabilizing influence of water vapor in saturated layers. Riverton, Wyoming, and Greensboro, North Carolina, in the extratropics, are analyzed in detail, where it is found that the annual and diurnal variations are largest, and the interannual variations are smallest in the LS. More unstable layer occurrences in the LS at Riverton are found at 0000 UTC, while at Greensboro, more unstable layer occurrences in the LS are at 1200 UTC, consistent with a geographical pattern where greater unstable layer occurrences in the LS are at 0000 UTC in the western United States, while greater unstable layer occurrences are at 1200 UTC in the eastern United States. The picture at Koror, Palau, in the tropics is different in that the diurnal and interannual variations in unstable layer occurrences in the LS are largest, with much smaller annual variations. At Koror, more frequent unstable layer occurrences in the LS occur at 0000 UTC. Also, a “notch” in the frequencies of occurrence of thin unstable layers at about 12 km is observed at Koror, with large frequencies of occurrence of thick layers at that altitude. Histograms are produced for the two midlatitude stations and one tropical station analyzed. The log–log slopes for troposphere histograms are in reasonable agreement with earlier results, but the LS histograms show a steeper log–log slope, consistent with more thin unstable layers and fewer thick unstable layers there. Some radiosonde stations are excluded from this analysis since a marked change in unstable layer occurrences was identified when a change in radiosonde instrumentation occurred.
more »
« less
Climatology of Atmospheric Unstable Layers Revisited: A Corrigendum
Abstract We have published a recent paper on differences between temperature fluctuations of various vertical scales in raw and processed U.S. high vertical resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD). In that paper, we note that the small-scale temperature fluctuations in the raw U.S. HVRRD are significantly larger than those in the processed U.S. HVRRD and that those small-scale temperature fluctuations are much larger during daytime that during nighttime. We believe that this is due to the varying amount of solar radiation falling on the radiosonde temperature sensor as the radiosonde instrument swings and rotates. In light of these new results, we present revisions to some of our conclusions about the climatology of atmospheric unstable layers. When we repeat our calculations of atmospheric unstable layers using the processed U.S. HVRRD, we find the following. 1) The 0000/1200 UTC differences in unstable layer occurrences in the lower stratosphere that were noted in our earlier paper essentially disappear. 2) The “notch” in the deep tropics where there is a relative deficiency of thin unstable layers and a corresponding excess of thicker layers is still a feature when processed data are analyzed, but the daytime notch is less marked when the processed data were used. 3) The discontinuity in unstable layer occurrences, when there was a change in radiosonde instrumentation, is still present when processed data are analyzed, but is diminished from what it was when the raw data were analyzed. Significance StatementIn a previous paper deriving the climatology of atmospheric unstable layers, we emphasized several findings. We reexamine three of the main points of that paper when processed U.S. high vertical resolution radiosonde data are analyzed instead of the raw data used in that previous paper. We find the 0000/1200 UTC differences virtually disappear in the new analysis. We find that the “notch” feature previously noted at Koror still exists, and we find that the discontinuity in unstable layers, when radiosonde instrumentation is changed, is diminished, but is still present in the new analysis.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10550404
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Meteorological Society
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Monthly Weather Review
- Volume:
- 152
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 0027-0644
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 2379-2385
- Size(s):
- p. 2379-2385
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract One-second U.S. high vertical-resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD) contain two different sets of temperature data—the raw data and the processed data. The processed data have been subject to radiation corrections, which have been well documented, and smoothing, the details of which are proprietary to the radiosonde manufacturers. We have tried to characterize this smoothing by computing the root-mean-square (rms) of normalized temperature perturbations derived from removing a second-degree polynomial fit for altitude segments (Δz) from 100 m to 5 km. We find that for Δz= 100 m, rms values are larger at higher altitudes, are larger in the raw data than in the processed data, and are larger during daytime than during nighttime, for both the raw and processed data. The rms values and their daytime to nighttime differences are larger in the raw data than in the processed data. As Δzincreases toward 5 km, the geographical patterns of rms over the contiguous United States from both the raw and processed data start resembling previously published gravity wave total energy patterns obtained from the older 6-s U.S. radiosonde data. An example is shown of a discontinuity in the small-scale rms values when radiosonde instrumentation is changed, so it is concluded that small-scale temperature fluctuations will be different for different radiosonde instruments. Examples are shown of enhanced small-scale rms temperature values indicative of turbulence resulting from gravity wave critical levels and from enhanced gravity waves due to seasonal maxima in convection. Significance StatementWe have characterized the variability of the raw and processed temperature profiles of the U.S. high vertical resolution radiosonde data for various vertical scales. We have argued that sources of small-scale fluctuations in the processed data include turbulence and the radiation effects which have not been accounted for in the current derivation of the processed data. Temperature fluctuations of larger scales correspond to those from gravity waves. We have shown an example of a discontinuity in small-scale fluctuations at a radiosonde station when the instrumentation was changed. These results suggest that temperature fluctuations resulting from varying amounts of solar radiation falling on the temperature sensor as the radiosonde instrumentation swings and rotates should be evaluated for each radiosonde system.more » « less
-
Abstract In a previous paper, we identified a “notch” in unstable layers at Koror (7.3°N, 134.5°E), where there was a relative deficiency in thin unstable layers and a corresponding relative excess in thicker layers, at altitudes centered at 12 km. We hypothesized that this feature was associated with the previously identified stability minimum in the tropics at that same altitude. In this paper, we extend our studies of this notch and its association with the tropical stability minimum by examining other stations in the deep tropics and also some stations at higher latitudes within the tropics. We find that this notch feature is found at all the other radiosonde stations in the deep tropics that we examined. We also find that the annual variations in unstable layer occurrences at stations at higher latitudes within the tropics show variations consistent with our hypothesis that this notch is associated with the region of minimum stability in the tropics at altitudes centered around 12 km, in that the annual variation in this notch feature is consistent with the annual variation of minimum stability in this region. Two factors contribute to the notch feature. One is that the data quality control procedure of the analysis rejects many thin layers due to the small trend-to-noise ratio in the region of minimum stability. The other is that the cloud-top outflow, which was previously identified with the stability minimum, advects thicker unstable layers throughout the deep tropics at the altitudes of the notch. Significance StatementPrevious papers have separately identified a stability minimum in the tropics and a “notch” feature in the thicknesses of unstable atmospheric layers where there are less thin unstable layers and a corresponding excess of thicker unstable layers, both at altitudes around 12 km. We previously hypothesized that these two features were associated with one another. In this paper, we examine this notch feature and the minimum in atmospheric stability at both deep tropical radiosonde stations and stations located at higher latitudes in the tropics, and we find that the annual variation of this notch feature is consistent with the latitudinal migration of the latitudes of the stability minimum. Turbulence associated with this notch feature might be significant for aircraft operations.more » « less
-
Evaluation of a land-atmosphere coupling metric computed from a ground-based infrared interferometerAbstract Land-atmosphere feedbacks are a critical component of the hydrologic cycle. Vertical profiles of boundary layer temperature and moisture, together with information about the land surface, are used to compute land-atmosphere coupling metrics. Ground based remote sensing platforms, such as the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI), can provide high temporal resolution vertical profiles of temperature and moisture. When co-located with soil moisture, surface flux, and surface meteorological observations, such as at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site, it is possible to observe both the terrestrial and atmospheric legs of land-atmosphere feedbacks. In this study, we compare a commonly used coupling metric computed from radiosonde-based data to that obtained from the AERI to characterize the accuracy and uncertainty in the metric derived from the two distinct platforms. This approach demonstrates the AERI’s utility where radiosonde observations are absent in time and/or space. Radiosonde and AERI based observations of the Convective Triggering Potential and Low-Level Humidity Index (CTP-HI low ) were computed during the 1200 UTC observation time and displayed good agreement during both 2017 and 2019 warm seasons. Radiosonde and AERI derived metrics diagnosed the same atmospheric preconditioning based upon the CTP-HI low framework a majority of the time. When retrieval uncertainty was considered, even greater agreement was found between radiosonde and AERI derived classification. The AERI’s ability to represent this coupling metric well enabled novel exploration of temporal variability within the overnight period in CTP and HI low . Observations of CTP-HI low computed within a few hours of 1200 UTC were essentially equivalent, however with greater differences in time arose greater differences in CTP and HI low .more » « less
-
Abstract Atmospheric turbulence plays a key role in the mixing of trace gases and diffusion of heat and momentum, as well as in aircraft operations. Although numerous observational turbulence studies have been conducted using campaign experiments and operational data, understanding the turbulence characteristics particularly in the free atmosphere remains challenging due to its small-scale, intermittent, and sporadic nature, along with limited observational data. To address this, turbulence in the free atmosphere is estimated herein based on the Thorpe method by using operational high vertical-resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD) with vertical resolutions of about 5 or 10 m across near-global regions, provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) via the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) for 6 years (October 2017–September 2023). Globally, turbulence is stronger in the troposphere than in the stratosphere, with maximum turbulence occurring about 6 km below the tropopause, followed by a sharp decrease above. Seasonal variations show strong tropospheric turbulence in summer and weak turbulence in winter for both hemispheres, while the stratosphere exhibits strong turbulence during spring. Regional analyses identify strong turbulence regions over the South Pacific and South Africa in the troposphere and over East Asia and South Africa in the stratosphere. Notably, turbulence information can be provided in regions and high altitudes that are not covered by commercial aircraft, suggesting its potential utility for both present and future high-altitude aircraft operations.more » « less
