An official website of the United States government
This work concerns process monitoring in the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. In this work, we developed and applied a novel in-situ solution for process stability monitoring and flaw detection using acoustic emission sensing. Current process monitoring methods in laser powder bed fusion only focus on the top surface of the deposition process, using an array of sensors to capture data on a layer-by-layer basis. Common sensors used for in-situ monitoring of the laser powder bed fusion process are optical, infrared, and highspeed imaging cameras along with pyrometers and photodiodes. A critical flaw with traditional top surface monitoring methodologies is that they are unable to reliably monitor the subsurface phenomena that occur in the laser powder bed fusion process. These subsurface effects are caused by the meltpool penetrating multiple layers below the top surface, leading to the re-solidification of the microstructure and potentially generating keyhole porosity. By only monitoring the top surface of the laser powder bed fusion process, the meltpool depth aspects and effects are ignored. To overcome the limitations of current in-situ monitoring of subsurface effects, this work utilizes four passive acoustic emission sensors attached to the build plate. These acoustic emission sensors monitor the energy emissions generated from the surface-level laser material interactions. Moreover, the acoustic emission signals are capable of traveling through the previously deposited layers, through the build plate, and to the sensors. Therefore, the acoustic waveform generated by the laser can capture process phenomena ranging from the crystallographic level to the macro-scale layer level which are at the root of flaw formation inside the deposited part. Hence, acoustic emission monitoring has the ability to monitor the subsurface effects in the laser powder bed fusion process. To monitor and analyze this acoustic waveform, novel wavelet-based decomposition is combined with heterogeneous sensor fusion to not only capture the acoustic waveform in time, but also in locational space on the build plate. Locational acoustic emission data enables the ability to determine the source of the generated acoustic waveform which is advantageous when the location of flaws is desired. This extracted spatially placed acoustic waveform data is able to detect the effect of processing parameters with a statistical fidelity of 99%. The proposed locational acoustic waveform monitoring method correlates to the resulting surface roughness of manufactured samples with a fidelity of 86%. Additionally, we show that acoustic waveform monitoring detects the onset of part failure, recoater crashes, and warpage prior a priori to the actual failure point.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on February 6, 2026
In-Process Monitoring of Part Quality in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process using Acoustic Emission Sensors
Abstract In this work, we used in-situ acoustic emission sensors for online monitoring of part quality in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. Currently, sensors such as thermo-optical imaging cameras and photodiodes are used to observe the laser-material interactions on the top surface of the powder bed. Data from these sensors is subsequently analyzed to detect onset of incipient flaws, e.g., porosity. However, these existing sensing modalities are unable to penetrate beyond the top surface of the powder bed. Consequently, there is a burgeoning need to detect thermal phenomena in the bulk volume of the part buried under the powder, as they are linked to such flaws as support failures, poor surface finish, microstructure heterogeneity, among others. Herein, four passive acoustic emission sensors were installed in the build plate of an EOS M290 LPBF system. Acoustic emission data was acquired during processing of stainless steel 316L samples under differing parameter settings and part design variations. The acoustic emission signals were decomposed using wavelet transforms. Subsequently, to localize the origin of AE signals to specific part features, they were spatially synchronized with infrared thermal images. The resulting spatially localized acoustic emission signatures were statistically correlated (R2 > 85%) to multi-scale aspects of part quality, such as thermal-induced part failures, surface roughness, and solidified microstructure (primary dendritic arm spacing). This work takes a critical step toward in-situ, non-destructive evaluation of multi-scale part quality aspects using acoustic emission sensors.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10575277
- Publisher / Repository:
- ASME Transactions
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
- ISSN:
- 1087-1357
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 48
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Laser powder bed fusion Acoustic emission wavelet analysis microstructure support failures surface finish.
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The goal of this work to mitigate flaws in metal parts produced from laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) process. As a step towards this goal, the objective of this work is to predict the build quality of a part as it is being printed via deep learning of in-situ layer-wise images obtained from an optical camera instrumented in the LPBF machine. To realize this objective, we designed a set of thin-wall features (fins) from Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) material with varying length-to-thickness ratio. These thin-wall test parts were printed under three different build orientations and in-situ images of their top surface were acquired during the process. The parts were examined offline using X-ray computed tomography (XCT), and their build quality was quantified in terms of statistical features, such as the thickness and consistency of its edges. Subsequently, a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to predict the XCT-derived statistical quality features using the layer-wise optical images of the thin-wall part as inputs. The statistical correlation between CNN-based predictions and XCT-observed quality measurements exceeds 85%. This work has two outcomes consequential to the sustainability of additive manufacturing: (1) It provides practitioners with a guideline for building thin-wall features with minimal defects, and (2) the high correlation between the offline XCT measurements and in-situ sensor-based quality metrics substantiates the potential for applying deep learning approaches for the real-time prediction of build flaws in LPBF.more » « less
-
Abstract This work pertains to the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The goal of this work is to mitigate the expense and time required for qualification of laser powder bed fusion processed parts. In pursuit of this goal, the objective of this work is to develop and apply a physics-based model predictive control strategy to modulate the thermal history before the part is built. The key idea is to determine a desired thermal history for a given part a priori to printing using a physics-based model. Subsequently, a model predictive control strategy is developed to attain the desired thermal history by changing the laser power layer-by-layer. This is an important area of research because the spatiotemporal distribution of temperature within the part (also known as the thermal history) influences flaw formation, microstructure evolution, and surface/geometric integrity, all of which ultimately determine the mechanical properties of the part. Currently, laser powder bed fusion parts are qualified using a build-and-test approach wherein parameters are optimized by printing simple test coupons, followed by examining their properties via materials characterization and testing — a cumbersome and expensive process that often takes years. These parameters, once optimized, are maintained constant throughout the process for a part. However, thermal history is a function of over 50 processing parameters including material properties and part design, consequently, the current approach of parameter optimization based on empirical testing of simple test coupons seldom transfers successfully to complex, practical parts. Rather than instinctive process parameter optimization, the model predictive control strategy presents a radically different approach to LPBF part qualification that is based on understanding and modulating the causal thermal physics of the process. The approach has three steps: (Step 1) Predict – given a part geometry, use a rapid, mesh-less physics-based simulation model to predict its thermal history, analyze the predicted thermal history trend, isolate potential red flag problems such as heat buildup, and set a desired thermal history that corrects deleterious trends. (Step 2) Parse – iteratively simulate the thermal history as a function of various laser power levels layer-by-layer over a fixed time horizon. (Step 3) Select – the laser power that provides the closest match to the desired thermal history. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the part is completely built. We demonstrate through experiments with various geometries two advantages of this model predictive control strategy when applied to laser powder bed fusion: (i) prevent part failures due to overheating and distortion, while mitigating the need for anchoring supports; and (ii) improve surface integrity of hard to access internal surfaces.more » « less
-
This work concerns the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. We developed and implemented a physics-based approach for layerwise control of the thermal history of an LPBF part. Controlling the thermal history of an LPBF part during the process is crucial as it influences critical-to-quality characteristics, such as porosity, solidified microstructure, cracking, surface finish, and geometric integrity, among others. Typically, LPBF processing parameters are optimized through exhaustive empirical build-and-test procedures. However, because thermal history varies with geometry, processing parameters seldom transfer between different part shapes. Furthermore, particularly in complex parts, the thermal history can vary significantly between layers leading to both within-part and between-part variation in properties. In this work, we devised an autonomous physics-based controller to maintain the thermal history within a desired window by optimizing the processing parameters layer by layer. This approach is a form of digital feedforward model predictive control. To demonstrate the approach, five thermal history control strategies were tested on four unique part geometries (20 total parts) made from stainless steel 316L alloy. The layerwise control of the thermal history significantly reduced variations in grain size and improved geometric accuracy and surface finish. This work provides a pathway for rapid, shape-agnostic qualification of LPBF part quality through control of the causal thermal history as opposed to expensive and cumbersome trial-and-error parameter optimization.more » « less
-
Design Rules and In-Situ Quality Monitoring of Thin-Wall Features Made Using Laser Powder Bed FusionThe goal of this work is to quantify the link between the design features (geometry), in-situ process sensor signatures, and build quality of parts made using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) process. This knowledge is critical for establishing design rules for AM parts, and to detecting impending build failures using in-process sensor data. As a step towards this goal, the objectives of this work are two-fold: Quantify the effect of the geometry and orientation on the build quality of thin-wall features. To explain further, the geometry-related factor is the ratio of the length of a thin-wall (l) to its thickness (t) defined as the aspect ratio (length-to-thickness ratio, l/t), and the angular orientation (θ) of the part, which is defined as the angle of the part in the X-Y plane relative to the re-coater blade of the LPBF machine. Assess the thin-wall build quality by analyzing images of the part obtained at each layer from an in-situ optical camera using a convolutional neural network. To realize these objectives, we designed a test part with a set of thin-wall features (fins) with varying aspect ratio from Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) material — the aspect ratio l/t of the thin-walls ranges from 36 to 183 (11 mm long (constant), and 0.06 mm to 0.3 mm in thickness). These thin-wall test parts were built under three angular orientations of 0°, 60°, and 90°. Further, the parts were examined offline using X-ray computed tomography (XCT). Through the offline XCT data, the build quality of the thin-wall features in terms of their geometric integrity is quantified as a function of the aspect ratio and orientation angle, which suggests a set of design guidelines for building thin-wall structures with LPBF. To monitor the quality of the thin-wall, in-process images of the top surface of the powder bed were acquired at each layer during the build process. The optical images are correlated with the post build quantitative measurements of the thin-wall through a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN). The statistical correlation (Pearson coefficient, ρ) between the offline XCT measured thin-wall quality, and CNN predicted measurement ranges from 80% to 98%. Consequently, the impending poor quality of a thin-wall is captured from in-situ process data.more » « less
