skip to main content


Title: Evaluating the mobility performance of autonomous vehicles at a signalized traffic intersection
Recent developments in autonomous vehicle (AV) or connected AVs (CAVs) technology have led to predictions that fully self-driven vehicles could completely change the transportation network over the next decades. However, at this stage, AVs and CAVs are still in the development stage which requires various trails in the field and machine learning through autonomous driving miles on real road networks. Until the complete market adoption of autonomous technology, a long transition period of coexistence between conventional and autonomous cars would exist. It is important to study and develop the expected driving behavior of future autonomous cars and the traffic simulation platforms provide an opportunity for researchers and technology developers to implement and assess the different behaviors of self-driving vehicle technology before launching it to the actual ground. This study utilizes PTV VISSIM microsimulation platform to evaluate the mobility performance of unmanned vehicles at a 4-way signalized traffic intersection. The software contains three different AV-ready driving logics such as AV-cautious, AV-normal, and AV-aggressive which were tested against the performance of the conventional vehicles, and the results of the study revealed that the overall network operational performance improves with the progressive introduction of AVs using AV-normal, and AV-aggressive driving behaviors while the AV-cautious driving behavior stays conservative and deteriorates the traffic performance.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2224135 1953102
NSF-PAR ID:
10328700
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
Zonta, Daniele; Su, Zhongqing; Glisic, Branko
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings Volume 12046, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2022
Page Range / eLocation ID:
57
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Autonomous Vehicle (AV) technology has the potential to significantly improve driver safety. Unfortunately, driver could be reluctant to ride with AVs due to the lack of trust and acceptance of AV’s driving styles. The present study investigated the impact of driver’s driving style (aggressive/defensive) and the designed driving styles of AVs (aggressive/defensive) on driver’s trust, acceptance, and take-over behavior in fully autonomous vehicles. Thirty-two participants were classified into two groups based on their driving styles using the Aggressive Driving Scale and experienced twelve scenarios in either an aggressive AV or a defensive AV. Results revealed that drivers’ trust, acceptance, and takeover frequency were significantly influenced by the interaction effects between AV’s driving style and driver’s driving style. The findings implied that driver’s individual differences should be considered in the design of AV’s driving styles to enhance driver’s trust and acceptance of AVs and reduce undesired take over behaviors. 
    more » « less
  2. Self-driving cars and trucks, autonomous vehicles (AVs), should not be accepted by regulatory bodies and the public until they have much higher confidence in their safety and reliability --- which can most practically and convincingly be achieved by testing. But existing testing methods are inadequate for checking the end-to-end behaviors of AV controllers against complex, real-world corner cases involving interactions with multiple independent agents such as pedestrians and human-driven vehicles. While test-driving AVs on streets and highways fails to capture many rare events, existing simulation-based testing methods mainly focus on simple scenarios and do not scale well for complex driving situations that require sophisticated awareness of the surroundings. To address these limitations, we propose a new fuzz testing technique, called AutoFuzz, which can leverage widely-used AV simulators' API grammars to generate semantically and temporally valid complex driving scenarios (sequences of scenes). To efficiently search for traffic violations-inducing scenarios in a large search space, we propose a constrained neural network (NN) evolutionary search method to optimize AutoFuzz. Evaluation of our prototype on one state-of-the-art learning-based controller, two rule-based controllers, and one industrial-grade controller in five scenarios shows that AutoFuzz efficiently finds hundreds of traffic violations in high-fidelity simulation environments. For each scenario, AutoFuzz can find on average 10-39% more unique traffic violations than the best-performing baseline method. Further, fine-tuning the learning-based controller with the traffic violations found by AutoFuzz successfully reduced the traffic violations found in the new version of the AV controller software. 
    more » « less
  3. A. Ghate, K. Krishnaiyer (Ed.)
    Deaths due to road traffic accidents are one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Furthermore, the economic impact of road traffic accidents accounts for about 3% of the United States' annual gross domestic product (GDP). In the past decade, extensive research has focused on autonomous vehicles (AVs). This technology is said to help prevent traffic accidents while promoting road traffic safety. This study aims to investigate the safety performance of AVs and identify the significant risk factors associated with the AV collisions. The study considers more than 200 crashes involving AVs and includes vehicle factors, environmental factors, collision type and crash severity. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with collision type. The results showed no statistically significant risk factors to crash severity. However, movement preceding to collision contributes significantly to collision type. When both vehicles are moving, there's a higher likelihood of an angled collision, 47% to be exact. The other scenario which demonstrates a high probability of an angled collision is when the AV vehicle is not moving while the other is moving. The highest probability for a rear-end collision to occur is when the AV vehicle is not moving while the other is moving. This scenario makes up 55% of the entire rear-end collisions. As for the second-highest proportion, both vehicles moving, it consists of 42%. The research shall help reduce AV involved collisions and increase driving safety. 
    more » « less
  4. Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are an emerging and highly impactful technology on today's roads. When assessing the performance of AVs, it is useful to study their improvement relative to common metrics such as fuel economy/emissions, safety, and congestion. But metrics of the vehicle's performance alone may not be complete; an AV that is affecting and reacting to a smart traffic light, for example, may improve its own performance, but may cause the same intersection to degrade the performance of other vehicles around the AV. Similar concerns arise in nearly all AV topics: platooning, light pre-emption, lane tracking, etc. Thus, the assessment of the vehicle's impacts on surrounding traffic is important, possibly even more important than the improvements enabled on the AV alone. But what boundary, or factors, define the vehicles, equipment, etc. “surrounding” an AV? The goal of this work is to characterize the boundary of vehicles “surrounding” an AV, referred to as Region of Influence, or ROI. Specifically, this work focuses on the problem that considering a perturbation is exerted into a traffic system, how far in time and space the perturbation from an AV’s decision can influence the surrounding system’s behavior. To achieve the goal, we utilized AIMSUN, a microscopic traffic simulator, to perform baseline and perturbed simulations. The ROI was evaluated by comparing trajectories of traffic surrounding the ego vehicle using different metrics, including difference in trajectories, Euclidian distance, rate of change of Euclidian distance, total number of lane changes over the whole simulation space versus time and total number of lane changes over the whole simulation time versus distance to ego vehicle. The results show that the ROI can be viewed from different perspectives using these metrics, and it is dependent on speed variance of the traffic. 
    more » « less
  5. Self-driving vehicles are the latest innovation in improving personal mobility and road safety by removing arguably error-prone humans from driving-related tasks. Such advances can prove especially beneficial for people who are blind or have low vision who cannot legally operate conventional motor vehicles. Missing from the related literature, we argue, are studies that describe strategies for vehicle design for these persons. We present a case study of the participatory design of a prototype for a self-driving vehicle human-machine interface (HMI) for a graduate-level course on inclusive design and accessible technology. We reflect on the process of working alongside a co-designer, a person with a visual disability, to identify user needs, define design ideas, and produce a low-fidelity prototype for the HMI. This paper may benefit researchers interested in using a similar approach for designing accessible autonomous vehicle technology. INTRODUCTION The rise of autonomous vehicles (AVs) may prove to be one of the most significant innovations in personal mobility of the past century. Advances in automated vehicle technology and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) specifically, may have a significant impact on road safety and a reduction in vehicle accidents (Brinkley et al., 2017; Dearen, 2018). According to the Department of Transportation (DoT), automated vehicles could help reduce road accidents caused by human error by as much as 94% (SAE International, n.d.). In addition to reducing traffic accidents and saving lives and property, autonomous vehicles may also prove to be of significant value to persons who cannot otherwise operate conventional motor vehicles. AVs may provide the necessary mobility, for instance, to help create new employment opportunities for nearly 40 million Americans with disabilities (Claypool et al., 2017; Guiding Eyes for the Blind, 2019), for instance. Advocates for the visually impaired specifically have expressed how “transformative” this technology can be for those who are blind or have significant low vision (Winter, 2015); persons who cannot otherwise legally operate a motor vehicle. While autonomous vehicles have the potential to break down transportation 
    more » « less